ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Banner ads hinder visual search and are forgotten
Full text PdfPdf (265 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Vienna, Austria
SESSION: Late breaking result papers table of contents
Pages: 1139 - 1142  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-703-6
Authors
Moira Burke  University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
Nicholas Gorman  Lewis & Clark College, Portland, OR
Erik Nilsen  Lewis & Clark College, Portland, OR
Anthony Hornof  University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 75,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985921.986008
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Banner ads persist on the Internet in spite of evidence against their efficacy. Many ads include animation in an attempt to increase their attentional capture. An experiment was conducted to examine how various banner ads affect the visual search of news headlines on the Web, and whether participants could recall the ads they saw. The results both support and contradict the notion of "banner blindness," the idea that people ignore banner ads. Participants could not recall the ads that they saw, but those ads did distract the users and significantly increased search times. The most surprising result is that recall was especially bad for animated banners. This paper examines issues of attentional capture in an applied domain and provides guidance for web designers.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Benway, J. P. (1998). Banner blindness: the irony of attention grabbing on the World Wide Web. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, USA, 1, 463--467
 
3
Green, D. M. & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
 
4
Hillstrom, A. P., & Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55(4), 399--411.
 
5
Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43(3), 346--354.
 
6
La Vache Q. R. (2001). Jocko homo. Suck.com. {Online}. Available: http://www.suck.com/daily/2001/04/24/1.html {2001, May 4}.
 
7
Pashler, H. (2001). Involuntary orienting to flashing distractors In delayed search? In Charles L. Folk and Bradley Gibson (Eds.), Attraction, Distraction, and Action: Multiple Perspectives on Attentional Capture. Advances in psychology. Elsevier Science.
 
8
Research sources and findings {Banner ad placement study}. (1998, April 13). Webreference.com. {Online}. Available http://www.webreference.com/dev/banners/research.html {2001, March 23}.
 
9


Collaborative Colleagues:
Moira Burke: colleagues
Nicholas Gorman: colleagues
Erik Nilsen: colleagues
Anthony Hornof: colleagues