ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
"Stuff goes into the computer and doesn't come out": a cross-tool study of personal information management
Full text PdfPdf (218 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Vienna, Austria
Pages: 583 - 590  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-702-8
Authors
Richard Boardman  Imperial College London, London, UK
M. Angela Sasse  University College London, London, UK
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCAPH: ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
SIGDOC : ACM Special Interest Group on Systems Documentation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 54,   Downloads (12 Months): 271,   Citation Count: 42
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.985766
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper reports a study of Personal Information Management (PIM), which advances research in two ways: (1) rather than focusing on one tool, we collected cross-tool data relating to file, email and web bookmark usage for each participant, and (2) we collected longitudinal data for a subset of the participants. We found that individuals employ a rich variety of strategies both within and across PIM tools, and we present new strategy classifications that reflect this behaviour. We discuss synergies and differences between tools that may be useful in guiding the design of tool integration. Our longitudinal data provides insight into how PIM behaviour evolves over time, and suggests how the supporting nature of PIM discourages reflection by users on their strategies. We discuss how the promotion of some reflection by tools and organizations may benefit users.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
4
5
 
6
 
7
Boardman, R., Spence, R. & Sasse, M.A. Too many hierarchies? The daily struggle for control of the workspace. Proc. HCI International 2003, Vol. 1, 616--620.
8
 
9
Jones, W., Dumais, S. & Bruce, H. Once found, what next? A study of 'keeping' behaviors in the personal use of web information. Proc. ASIST 2002, 391--402.
10
 
11
Lansdale, M. The psychology of personal information management. Applied Ergonomics 19,1 (1988), 55--66.
12
13
 
14
Whittaker, S., Terveen, L. & Nardi, B. Let's stop pushing the envelope & start addressing it: a reference task agenda for HCI. Human Computer Interaction 15 (2000), 75--106.
15

CITED BY  42

Collaborative Colleagues:
Richard Boardman: colleagues
M. Angela Sasse: colleagues