ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space
Full text PdfPdf (312 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Vienna, Austria
Pages: 543 - 550  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-702-8
Authors
Cliff Lampe  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Paul Resnick  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCAPH: ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
SIGDOC : ACM Special Interest Group on Systems Documentation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 96,   Citation Count: 29
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.985761
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Can a system of distributed moderation quickly and consistently separate high and low quality comments in an online conversation? Analysis of the site Slashdot.org suggests that the answer is a qualified yes, but that important challenges remain for designers of such systems. Thousands of users act as moderators. Final scores for comments are reasonably dispersed and the community generally agrees that moderations are fair. On the other hand, much of a conversation can pass before the best and worst comments are identified. Of those moderations that were judged unfair, only about half were subsequently counterbalanced by a moderation in the other direction. And comments with low scores, not at top-level, or posted late in a conversation were more likely to be overlooked by moderators.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Avery, C., P. Resnick, and R. Zeckhauser, The Market for Evaluations. American Economic Review, 1999. 89(3): p. 564--584.
 
2
Banerjee, A., A Simple Model of Herd Behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992. 107(3): p. 797--818.
 
3
Bikhchandani, S., D. Hirshleifer, and I. Welch, A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 1989. 100(5): p. 992--1026.
 
4
Butler, B., When is a group not a group: An empirical examination of metaphors for online social structure. 1999, Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh.
 
5
Friedman, E.J. and P. Resnick, The Social Cost of Cheap Pseudonyms. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 1997. 10(2): p. 173--179.
6
 
7
Grice, H.P., Utterer's meaning and intentions. Philosophical Review, 1969. 78: p. 147--177.
 
8
 
9
Kollock, P. and M. Smith, Managing the Virtual Commons: Cooperation and Conflict in Computer Communities, in Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, S. Herring, Editor. 1996, John Benjamin: Amsterdam.
 
10
Malda, R., Slashdot FAQ, . 2003, http://slashdot.org
 
11
Pfaffenberger, B., A Standing Wave in the Web of Our Communications: Usenet and the Socio-Technical Construction of Cyberspace Values, in From Usenet to CoWebs: Interacting with Social Information Spaces, C. Lueg and D. Fisher, Editors. 2002, Springer Verlag: New York, NY.
12
 
13
Sack, W., Conversation map: An interface for very large-scale conversations. Journal of Management information Systems, 2000. 17(3): p. 73--92.
 
14
15
 
16
Terveen, L. and W. Hill, Beyond recommender systems: Helping people help each other, in HCI in the New Millennium, J.M. Carroll, Editor. 2001, Addison-Wesley: New York.
17

CITED BY  29

Collaborative Colleagues:
Cliff Lampe: colleagues
Paul Resnick: colleagues