ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A diary study of task switching and interruptions
Full text PdfPdf (352 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Vienna, Austria
Pages: 175 - 182  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-702-8
Authors
Mary Czerwinski  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Eric Horvitz  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Susan Wilhite  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCAPH: ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
SIGDOC : ACM Special Interest Group on Systems Documentation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 94,   Downloads (12 Months): 425,   Citation Count: 57
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.985715
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We report on a diary study of the activities of information workers aimed at characterizing how people interleave multiple tasks amidst interruptions. The week-long study revealed the type and complexity of activities performed, the nature of the interruptions experienced, and the difficulty of shifting among numerous tasks. We present key findings from the diary study and discuss implications of the findings. Finally, we describe promising directions in the design of software tools for task management, motivated by the findings.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
Chambers, C.V., Balaban, D.J., Carlson, B.L., Ungemack, J.A. MPH &Grasberger, D.M. (1989). Microcomputer-generated reminders: Improving the compliance of primary care physicians with mammography screening guidelines. Journal of Family Practice, 29(3), 273--280.
 
4
Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E., & Horvitz, E. (2000). Instant Messaging and Interruption: Influence of Task Type on Performance. Proceedings of OZCHI 2000, 356--361.
 
5
Czerwinski, M. & Horvitz, E. (2002). Memory for Daily Computing Events. <<http://research.microsoft.com/~marycz/hci2002final.pdf> In Faulkner, X., Finlay, J. & Detienne, F. (Eds.), People and Computers XVI, Proceedings of HCI 2002, 230--245.
6
 
7
DeVaul, R.W., Clarkson, B. & Pentland, A.S. (2000). The memory glasses: Towards a wearable, context-aware, situation-appropriate reminder system. <<http://web.media.mit.edu/~rich/memory/SIUC00/>Main.html.
 
8
9
 
10
Ellis, J. & Kvavilashvili, L. (2000). Prospective memory in 2000: Past, present and future directions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 1--9.
11
 
12
Gillie, T. Broadbent, D. (1989). What Makes Interruptions Disruptive? A Study of Length, Similarity, and Complexity. Psychological Research, 50, 243--50.
13
14
 
15
Hess, S.M. & Detweiler, M.C. (1994). Training to reduce the disruptive effects of interruptions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society's 38th Annual Meeting, 1173--1177.
 
16
Hess, S., Detweiler, M.C., & Ellis, R. D. (1999). The utility of display space in keeping-track of rapidly changing information. Human Factors, 41(2), 257--281.
17
18
19
 
20
Kaptelinin, V. (2002) UMEA: User-Monitoring Environment for Activities. UIST '02 Companion. Posters and Demos from the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 31--32.
 
21
 
22
Lamming, M., Brown, P., Carter, K., Eldridge, M., Flynn, M., Louie, G., Robinson, P., & Sellen, AJ. (1994). The design of a human memory prosthesis. Computer Journal, 37(3), 153--163.
23
24
25
 
26
McFarlane, D.C. & Latorella, K.A. (2002). The Scope and Importance of Human Interruption in HCI design, Human Computer Interaction, 17, 1--62.
 
27
28
29
 
30
Renaud, K. (2000). Expediting rapid recovery from interruptions by providing a visualization of application activity. Proceedings of OZCHI 2000, 348--355.
 
31
Rhodes B, Starner T. (1996). Remembrance agent: A continuously running automated information retrieval system. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi Agent Technology (PAAM '96). London, UK, 487--495.
32
 
33
Sellen, A.J., Louie, G, Harris, J.E. & Wilkins, A.J. (1996). What brings intentions to mind? An in situ study of prospective memory. Memory, 5(4), 483--507.
 
34
Smith, G., Baudisch, P., Robertson, G. G., Czerwinski, M., Meyers, B., Robbins, D., & Andrews, D. (2003). GroupBar: The TaskBar evolved. Proceedings of OZCHI 2003.
 
35
Terry, W.S. (1988). Everyday forgetting: Data from a diary study. Psychological Reports, 62, 299--303.

CITED BY  57

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mary Czerwinski: colleagues
Eric Horvitz: colleagues
Susan Wilhite: colleagues