ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Cutting hyperplane arrangements
Full text PdfPdf (764 KB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the sixth annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
Berkley, California, United States
Pages: 1 - 9  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-89791-362-0
Editor
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/98524.98528
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We will consider an arrangement H of n hyperplanes in Ed (where the dimension d is fixed). An &egr;-cutting for H will be a collection of (possibly unbounded) d-dimensional simplices with disjoint interiors, which cover all Ed and such that the interior of any simplex is intersected by at most &egr;n hyperplanes of H. We give a deterministic algorithm, finding a (1/r)-cutting with &Ogr;(rd(log r)C) simplices in time &Ogr;(n(log n)Ard-1 (log r)B) (A,B,C are constants dependent on dimension). In a similar time bound (with an additional &Ogr;(r&Ogr;(1)) overhead) we can also find a (1/r)-net for the range space (X, H(X)), where X is a n-point set in Ed and H(X) denotes the set of all subsets of X which can be cut by a halfspace. This (1/r)-net has size &Ogr;(r log r), which matches the best known existence result; in fact, the method gives a constructive existence proof. In the plane, we can obtain a (1/r)-cutting of optimal size &Ogr;(r2) in time &Ogr;(nr) (which is optimal if we want to compute also the collection of lines intersecting each simplex of the cutting). This improves the result of Agarwal, and our algorithm is conceptually simpler.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
AHU
Aga
Aga1
CEG
 
CF
B.ChazeUe, J.Friedman: A deterministic view of random sampling and its use in geometry, Report CS-TR-181-88, extended abstract FOCS 1988, pp.539-549
Cla
 
Cla1
 
C&al
K.Clarkson, H.Edelsbrunner, L.Guibas, M.Sharir, E.Welzh Combinatorial complexity for arrangements of curves and surfaces, FOCS 1988, pp. 568-579
 
Ede
 
E&al
 
EOS
 
HW
D.Haussler, E.Welzh e-nets and simplex range queries, Discr. & Comput. Geometry 2(1987) pp. 127-151
Ma
 
Ma1
J.Matou~ek: Approximate halfplanar range counting, KAM Series 59-87, Charles University 1987
 
PW
J.Pach, G. Woeginger: Some new bounds for epsilon-nets, Report B-89-08 Serie B - Informatik, FU Berlin 1989
YY