ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Virtual radar imaging for sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (202 KB)
Source Information Processing In Sensor Networks archive
Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks table of contents
Berkeley, California, USA
SESSION: Oral presentation session V: query processing and data collection table of contents
Pages: 294 - 300  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-846-6
Authors
Bharath Ananthasubramaniam  University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
Upamanyu Madhow  University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
Sponsor
SIGBED: ACM Special Interest Group on Embedded Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/984622.984665
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Most approaches to sensor data collection in the literature are based on a multihop wireless relay between sensor nodes forming an ad hoc network to reach a remote data-processing destination. In this paper, we propose an alternative Virtual Radar paradigm, which, in its most rudimentary form, is implementable with sensor nodes without networking capabilities. We introduce this concept for a simple setting in which each sensor only has one bit of information to send (e.g., indicating whether the level of a certain chemical has crossed a threshold). "Active" sensors (those which have one to send) respond to a beacon sent by the collector node, precisely timed with a trigger sequence in the beacon. The collector node uses a modified version of synthetic aperture radar processing to obtain an "image" of the activity in the sensor network.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
S. R. Das, C. E. Perkins, and E. M. Royer, "Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks," in INFOCOM 2000, vol. 1, pp. 3--12, March 2000.
4
 
5
 
6
S. S. Pradhan, J. Kusuma, and K. Ramchandran, "Distributed compression in a dense microsensor network," in IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 19, pp. 51--60, March 2002.
 
7
M. Gastpar and M. Vetterli, "On the capacity of wireless networks: the relay case," in IEEE INFOCOM 2002, vol. 3, pp. 1577--1586, 2002.
 
8
S. D. Servetto, "Distributed signal processing algorithms for the sensor broadcast problem," in Proc. 37th Annual Conf. on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS 2003), March 2003.
 
9
J. Curlander and R. McDonough, Synthetic Aperture Radar: Systems and Signal Processing. John Wiley and Sons,Inc., 1991.
 
10
D.C.Munson and R.L.Visentin, "A signal processing view of strip-mapping synthetic aperture radar," IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. 37, pp. 2131--2147, Dec 1989.
 
11
O. A. J.A.C Lee and D.C.Munson, "Formulation of a general imaging algorithm for high resolution synthetic aperture radar," in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings, vol. 4, pp. 2092--5, 1996.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Bharath Ananthasubramaniam: colleagues
Upamanyu Madhow: colleagues