ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Streams, structures, spaces, scenarios, societies (5s): A formal model for digital libraries
Full text PdfPdf (317 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) archive
Volume 22 ,  Issue 2  (April 2004) table of contents
Pages: 270 - 312  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:1046-8188
Authors
Marcos André Gonçalves  Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
Edward A. Fox  Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
Layne T. Watson  Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
Neill A. Kipp  Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 52,   Downloads (12 Months): 422,   Citation Count: 18
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/984321.984325
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Digital libraries (DLs) are complex information systems and therefore demand formal foundations lest development efforts diverge and interoperability suffers. In this article, we propose the fundamental abstractions of Streams, Structures, Spaces, Scenarios, and Societies (5S), which allow us to define digital libraries rigorously and usefully. Streams are sequences of arbitrary items used to describe both static and dynamic (e.g., video) content. Structures can be viewed as labeled directed graphs, which impose organization. Spaces are sets with operations on those sets that obey certain constraints. Scenarios consist of sequences of events or actions that modify states of a computation in order to accomplish a functional requirement. Societies are sets of entities and activities and the relationships among them. Together these abstractions provide a formal foundation to define, relate, and unify concepts---among others, of digital objects, metadata, collections, and services---required to formalize and elucidate "digital libraries". The applicability, versatility, and unifying power of the 5S model are demonstrated through its use in three distinct applications: building and interpretation of a DL taxonomy, informal and formal analysis of case studies of digital libraries (NDLTD and OAI), and utilization as a formal basis for a DL description language.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Abiteboul, S., Quass, D., McHugh, J., Widom, J., and Wiener, J. L. 1997. The Lorel query language for semistructured data. Int. J. Digit. Lib. 1, 1 (Apr.) 5--19.
 
3
 
4
 
5
Atkins, A., Fox, E., France, R., and Suleman, H. 2001. Interoperability metadata standard for electronic theses and dissertations. http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/current.html.
 
6
 
7
Baeza-Yates, R. and Navarro, G. 2000. XQL and Proximal Nodes. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR 2000---Workshop on XML and Information Retrieval (Athens, Greece, July). ACM, New York, Reading, Mass.
 
8
 
9
Bayley, K. D. 1994. Typologies and Taxonomies---An Introduction to Classification Techniques. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
10
 
11
 
12
Belkin, N. J., Oddy, R. N., and Brooks, H. M. 1982. ASK for information retrieval. J. Document. 33, 2 (June), 61--71.
 
13
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. 2001. The semantic web. Sci. Amer. 284, 5 (May).
14
 
15
 
16
Borlund, P. and Ingwersen, P. 1997. The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. J. Document. 53, 3 (June), 225--250.
 
17
 
18
 
19
Clarke, C. L., Cormack, G. V., and Burkowski, F. J. 1995. An algebra for structured text search and a framework for its implementation. Comput. J. 38, 43--56.
20
21
 
22
23
24
25
 
26
27
 
28
DOMTeam. 2003. Document object model (DOM) homepage. http://www.w3.org/DOM/.
29
 
30
Dushay, N. 2001. Using structural metadata to localize experience of digital content. Tech. Rep. cs.DL/0112017, The Computing Research Repository (CoRR).
 
31
 
32
Flanagan, J. W., Fox, E. A., and Fan, W. 2003. Managing complex information applications: An archaeology digital library. http://feathers.dlib.vt.edu/.
 
33
Foskett, D. J. 1980. Thesaurus. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science---Volume 30. Marcel Dekker, New York, 416--462.
34
 
35
Fox, E. A., Eaton, J. L., McMillan, G., Kipp, N. A., Mather, P., McGonigle, T., Schweiker, W., and DeVane, B. 1997. Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations: An international effort unlocking university resources. D-Lib Mag. 3, 9 (Sept).
36
 
37
France, R. K., Gonçalves, M. A., and Fox, E. A. 2002. MARIAN digital library system. http://www.dlib.vt.edu/products/marian.html.
38
 
39
Fuhr, N. 2000. XIRQL---An extension of XQL for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR 2000---Workshop on XML and Information Retrieval (Athens, Greece, July). ACM, New York.
 
40
Furuta, R. 1994. Defining and using structure in digital documents. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (College Station, Tex.).
 
41
 
42
Garza-Salazar, D. A. 2001. Phronesis. http://copernico.mty.itesm.mx/ tempo/Proyectos/.
 
43
Gladney, H., Fox, E. A., Ahmed, Z., Ashany, R., Belkin, N. J., and Zemankova, M. 1994. Digital library: Gross Structure and Requirements: Report from a March 1994 Workshop. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (Texas), 101--107.
44
 
45
Godement, R. 1969. Algebra. Kershaw Publ. Co. Ltd, London, England.
46
 
47
 
48
Gonçalves, M. A. 2003. Digital libraries: Formal theory, language, design, generation, quality and evaluation. Ph.D. preliminary exam, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
49
 
50
Gonçalves, M. A., Fox, E. A., Watson, L. T., and Kipp, N. 2003. Streams, structures, spaces, scenarios, societies (5S): A formal model for digital libraries. Tech. Rep. 03-04, Virginia Tech.
 
51
 
52
 
53
Gonçalves, M. A., Zafer, A. A., Ramakrishnan, N., and Fox, E. A. 2001. Modeling and building personalized digital libraries with PIPE and 5SL. In Proceedings of the Joint DELOS-NSF Workshop on Personalization and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries (Dublin, Ireland).
54
 
55
 
56
 
57
 
59
Kalinichenko, L. A., Briukhov, D. O., Skvortsov, N. A., and Zakharov, V. N. 2000. Infrastructure of the subject mediating environment aiming at semantic interoperability of heterogeneous digital library collections. In Proceedings of the 2nd Russian Scientific Conference on Digital Libraries: Advanced Methods and Technologies.
60
 
61
Kelapure, R., Gonçalves, M. A., and Fox, E. A. 2003. Scenario-based generation of digital library services. In Proceedings 7th European Conference Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2760, Springer-Verlag, New York. (Trondheim, Norway).
 
62
 
63
 
64
 
65
Lagoze, C. 1996. The Warwick framework: A container architecture for diverse sets of metadata. D-Lib Mag. 2, 7 (July 15).
66
 
67
 
68
Lesk, M. 1999. Expanding digital library research: Media, genre, place and subjects. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Digital Libraries 1999: ISDL'99 (Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan).
69
 
70
Library Of Congress. 2003. METS---Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard. http:// www.loc.gov/standards/mets/.
 
71
72
73
 
74
 
75
Miller, T. 1999. Annotation system for a collection of ETDs. http://www.ndltd.org/ndltd-sc/990416/annsystem.pdf.
76
 
77
NDLTD. 2003. Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. http://www.ndltd.org.
78
79
80
 
81
OAI. 2001. Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting---v.2.0. http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html.
82
83
 
84
85
 
86
 
87
Ranganathan, S. R. 1965. A Descriptive Account of Colon Classification. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, Bangalore, India.
 
88
Reddy, R. and Wladawsky-Berger, I. 2001. Digital libraries: Universal access to human knowledge---A report to the president. President's Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC), Panel on Digital Libraries. http://www.itrd.gov/pubs/pitac/pitac-dl-9feb01.pdf.
 
89
Robertson, S. E. 1977. The probability ranking principle in IR. Doc. J. 33, 294--304.
 
90
Robertson, S. E. and Jones, K. S. 1976. Relevance weighting of search terms. J. ASIS 27, 3 (May--June), 129--146.
91
92
93
94
 
95
Saracevic, T. 1975. Relevance: a review and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. J. ASIS 26, 321--343.
 
96
Schauble, P. and Smeaton, A. F. 1998. Summary report of the series of joint NSF-EU working groups on future directions for digital library research: An international research agenda for digital libraries. http://www.ercim.org/publication/ws-proceedings.
97
98
 
99
Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379--423, 623--656.
100
 
101
 
102
 
103
Staples, T., Wayland, R., and Payette, S. 2003. The FEDORA project---An open-source digital object repository management system. D-Lib Maga. 9, 4 (Apr.).
 
104
 
105
106
 
107
108
 
109
 
110
Vickery, B. C. 1965. Faceted classification schemes. In Rutgers Series for the Intellectual Organization of Information---Volume 5. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J.
 
111
VTLS. 2001. VTLS. http://www.vtls.com.
 
112
W3C. 1998. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification. http:// www.w3.org/TR/WD-rdf-syntax/.
 
113
W3C. 2000a. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0. http://www.w3. org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/.
 
114
W3C. 2000b. XML Schema Part 0: Primer, W3C Working Draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/ xmlschema-0.
 
115
W3C. 2001. Mathematical Markup Language (MathML). http://www.w3.org/Math/.
 
116
Wang, B. 1999. A hybrid system approach for supporting digital libraries. Int. J. Dig. Lib. 2, 2-3, 91--110.
117
118
 
119
Wilkison, R. and Fuller, M. 1996. Integration of information retrieval and hypertext via structure. In Inf. Ret. Hyper. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 257--271.
 
120
121
122
 
123
Zhu, Q., Gonçalves, M. A., Shen, R., Cassell, L., and Fox, E. A. 2003. Visual semantic modeling of digital libraries. In Proceedings 7th European Conference Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL). (Trondheim, Norway). Lecture Notes on Computer Science, vol. 2769. Springer-Verlag, New York.
124
 
125
 
126
Zubair, M., Maly, K., Ameerally, I., and Nelson, M. 2000. Dynamic construction of federated digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 9th International World Wide Web Conference Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

CITED BY  18


REVIEW

"Mercedes Martinez Gonzalez : Reviewer"

Digital libraries are highly interdisciplinary information systems, since issues pertaining to hypertext, information retrieval, database management, and social issues are relevant to their development. This diversity makes these systems interesti  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Marcos André Gonçalves: colleagues
Edward A. Fox: colleagues
Layne T. Watson: colleagues
Neill A. Kipp: colleagues