ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Theoretical foundations for experiential systems design
Full text PdfPdf (403 KB)
Source International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMM workshop on Experiential telepresence table of contents
Berkeley, California
SESSION: Modelling experience table of contents
Pages: 45 - 52  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-775-3
Author
Marc Davis  University of California at Berkeley
Sponsors
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 77,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/982484.982491
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

As multimedia researchers analyze and design "experiential systems' there is a pressing need to place that work on a solid theoretical foundation. Without careful analysis of the objects and methods, terminology, and conceptual frameworks of experiential systems design, misconceptions about what experiences are and how they can be computationally addressed can allow research to proceed in less fruitful directions. This paper addresses core theoretical issues in experiential systems design about the nature of experience, especially the distinction between data which can be represented computationally and experiences which are internal mental events We draw from theoretical work in the humanities that addresses models of human communication and meaning creation, the philosophical investigation of the structures of lived experience (phenomenology), and the application of that philosophical method to understanding the forms and functions of mediated experience (aesthetics). Phenomenology and aesthetics form a theoretical foundation for reassessing the limits and possibilities of computationally modeling and shaping experiences. Radically interdisciplinary work is required that truly integrates technical and humanistic research in order to design experiential systems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Armstrong, P. B. Phenomenology. in Groden, M. and Kreiswirth, M. eds. The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1997.
 
2
Bazin, A. What is Cinema? University of California Press, Berkeley, 1971.
 
3
Bordwell, D. Narration in the Fiction Film. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1985.
 
4
Bordwell, D. and Thompson, K. Film Art: An Introduction. McGraw Hill, New York, 2003.
 
5
Davis, M. and Travers, M. A Brief Overview of the Narrative Intelligence Reading Group. in Mateas, M. and Sengers, P. eds. Narrative Intelligence, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 2003, 27--38.
 
6
Descartes, R., Spinoza, B. d. and Leibniz, G. W. The Rationalists. Doubleday, Garden City, New York, 1961.
 
7
Eisenstein, S. M. Film Form: Essays in Film Theory. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, San Diego, 1949.
 
8
Eisenstein, S. M. The Film Sense. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, San Diego, 1947.
 
9
Gadamer, H. G. Philosophical Hermeneutics. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1976.
 
10
Iser, W. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1978.
 
11
Iser, W. The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach. in The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1974, 274--294.
12
 
13
Locke, J., Berkeley, G. and Hume, D. The Empiricists. Anchor Books/Doubleday, New York, 1990.
 
14
Manovich, L. The Language of New Media. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2001.
 
15
Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1962.
 
16
Reddy, M. The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language. in Ortony, A. ed. Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge England; New York, NY, 1993, 164--201.
 
17
Saussure, F. d. Course in General Linguistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.
 
18
Tompkins, J. Reader-Response Criticism. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
 
19
Varela, F. J. The Specious Present: A Neurophenomenology of Time Consciousness. in Petitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, B. and Roy, J.-M. eds. Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1999, 266--314.
 
20

CITED BY  11