The UAN: a user-oriented representation for direct manipulation interface designs

ABSTRACT

Many existing interface representation techniques, especially those associated with UIMS, are constructional and focused on interface implementation, and therefore do not adequately support a user-centered focus. But it is in the behavioral domain of the user that interface designers and evaluators do their work. We are seeking to complement constructional methods by providing a tool-supported technique capable of specifying the behavioral aspects of an interactive system–the tasks and the actions a user performs to accomplish those tasks. In particular, this paper is a practical introduction to use of the User Action Notation (UAN), a task- and user-oriented notation for behavioral representation of asynchronous, direct manipulation interface designs. Interfaces are specified in UAN as a quasihierarchy of asynchronous tasks. At the lower levels, user actions are associated with feedback and system state changes. The notation makes use of visually onomatopoeic symbols and is simple enough to read with little instruction. UAN is being used by growing numbers of interface developers and researchers. In addition to its design role, current research is investigating how UAN can support production and maintenance of code and documentation.

REFERENCES

• 1: BUXTON, W. There's more to interaction than meets the eye: Some issues in manual input. In User Centered System Design. D. A. Norman and S. Draper, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N. J., 1986.
• 2: Stuart K. Card , Thomas P. Moran , Allen Newell, The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems, Communications of the ACM, v.23 n.7, p.396-410, July 1980 [doi>10.1145/358886.358895]
• 3: Stuart K. Card , Allen Newell , Thomas P. Moran, The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1983
• 4: Luca Cardelli , Rob Pike, Squeak: a language for communicating with mice, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.19 n.3, p.199-204, Jul. 1985
• 5: DRAPER, S. Personal communication, 1989.
• 6: FITTS, P.M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exper. Psych. 47 (1954), 381-391.
• 7: Mark A. Flecchia , R. Daniel Bergeron, Specifying complex dialogs in ALGAE, Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI conference on Human factors in computing systems and graphics interface, p.229-234, April 05-09, 1987, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• 8: J. Foley , C. Gibbs , S. Kovacevic, A knowledge-based user interface management system, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.67-72, May 15-19, 1988, Washington, D.C., United States [doi>10.1145/57167.57178]
• 9: John D. Gould , Clayton Lewis, Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think, Communications of the ACM, v.28 n.3, p.300-311, March 1985 [doi>10.1145/3166.3170]
• 10: Mark Green, The University of Alberta user interface management system, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.19 n.3, p.205-213, Jul. 1985
• 11: Mark Green, A survey of three dialogue models, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.5 n.3, p.244-275, July 1986 [doi>10.1145/24054.24057]
• 12: HARTSON, H. R., AND GRAY, P. Temporal aspects of tasks in the user action notation. To appear in Human-Computer Interaction, 1990.
• 13: H. R. Hartson , D. Hix, Toward empirically derived methodologies and tools for human-computer interface development, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.31 n.4, p.477-494, Oct. 1989 [doi>10.1016/0020-7373(89)90005-9]
• 14: Ralph D. Hill, Event-response systems: a technique for specifying multi-threaded dialogues, Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI conference on Human factors in computing systems and graphics interface, p.241-248, April 05-09, 1987, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• 15: JACOB, R. J.K. An executable specification technique for describing human-computer interaction. In Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. H. R. Hartson, Ed. Ablex, Norwood, N.j., 1985.
• 16: Robert J. K. Jacob, A specification language for direct-manipulation user interfaces, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.5 n.4, p.283-317, Oct. 1986 [doi>10.1145/27623.27624]
• 17: KIERAS, D., AND POLSON, P.G. An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 22 (1985), 365-394.
• 18: MORAN, T. P. The command language grammar: A representation for the user interface of interactive computer systems. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 15 (1981), 3-51.
• 19: Brad A. Myers, Creating dynamic interaction techniques by demonstration, Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI conference on Human factors in computing systems and graphics interface, p.271-278, April 05-09, 1987, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• 20: NORMAN, D. A. Cognitive engineering. In User Centered System Design. D. A. Norman and S. Draper, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1986.
• 21: Dan R. Olsen, Jr., MIKE: the menu interaction kontrol environment, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.5 n.4, p.318-344, Oct. 1986 [doi>10.1145/27623.28868]
• 22: Dan R Olsen, Jr. , Elizabeth P. Dempsey, SYNGRAPH: A graphical user interface generator, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.17 n.3, p.43-50, July 1983
• 23: PAYNE, S. J., AND GREEN, T. R.G. Task-action grammars: A model of the mental representation of task languages. In Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1986.
• 24: REISNER, P. Formal grammar and human factors design of an interactive graphics system. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-7 (1981), 229-240.
• 25: J. T. Richards , S. J. Boies , J. D. Gould, Rapid prototyping and system development: examination of an interface toolkit for voice and telephony applications, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.216-220, April 13-17, 1986, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 26: SHARRATT, B. Personal communication, 1989.
• 27: SHNEIDERMAN, B. Multi-party grammars and related features for designing interactive systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 12, 2 (Mar.-Apr. 1982), 148-154.
• 28: A. C. Siochi , H. R. Hartson, Task-oriented representation of asynchronous user interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Wings for the mind, p.183-188, March 1989
• 29: Antonio C. Siochi , H. R Hartson , Deborah Hix, Notational Techniques for Accommodating User Intention Shifts, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA, 1990
• 30: WASSERMAN, A. I., AND SHEWMAKE, D. T. The role of prototypes in the user software engineering methodology. In Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. H. R. Hartson, Ed. Ablex, Norwood, N.J., 1985.
• 31: YUNTEN, T., AND HARTSON, H.R. A SUPERvisory methodology and notation (SUPERMAN) for human-computer system development. In Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. H. R. Hartson, Ed. Ablex, Norwood, N.J., 1985.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: User interfaces

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.6 Programming Environments
          Subjects: Interactive environments

  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation); User interface management systems (UIMS)

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Languages