ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analysing UML 2.0 activity diagrams in the software performance engineering process
Full text PdfPdf (573 KB)
Source Workshop on Software and Performance archive
Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Software and performance table of contents
Redwood Shores, California
SESSION: Performance analysis table of contents
Pages: 74 - 78  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN ~ ISSN:0163-5948 , 1-58113-673-0
Also published in ...
Authors
C. Canevet  The University of Edinburgh, Scotland
S. Gilmore  The University of Edinburgh, Scotland
J. Hillston  The University of Edinburgh, Scotland
L. Kloul  The University of Edinburgh, Scotland
P. Stevens  The University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Sponsors
SIGMETRICS: ACM Special Interest Group on Measurement and Evaluation
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 67,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/974044.974055
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present an original method of analysing the newly-revised UML2.0 activity diagrams. Our analysis method builds on our formal interpretation of these diagrams with respect to the UML2.0 standard. The mapping into another formalism is the first stage of a refinement process which ultimately delivers derived analytical results on the model. This process highlights latent performance problems hidden in the high-level design, allowing software developers to fix these design flaws before they are concretised in implementation code. We exercise our analysis approach on a substantial example of modelling a multi-player distributed role-playing game.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C. Canevet, S. Gilmore, J. Hillston, M. Prowse, and P. Stevens. Performance modelling with UML and stochastic process algebras. IEE Proceedings: Computers and Digital Techniques, 150(2): 107--120, Mar. 2003.
2
 
3
H. Jungnitz and A. Desrochers. Flow equivalent nets for the performance analysis of flexible manufacturing systems. In Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 122--127, Sacramento, CA, USA, 1991.
 
4
 
5
U2P. Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure version 2.0, April 2003. Available from http://www.omg.org/uml/as ad/03-04-01.

Collaborative Colleagues:
C. Canevet: colleagues
S. Gilmore: colleagues
J. Hillston: colleagues
L. Kloul: colleagues
P. Stevens: colleagues