When children reflect on their own playing style: experiments with continuator and children

ABSTRACT

The Continuator project concerns the study of interactive musical systems that are able to learn musical styles. The Continuator system was developed with the primary goal of designing new musical instruments in the context of improvised music. The strong subjective impressions created with the use of the system led us to consider its use in a pedagogical context. This article describes experiments conducted with the system and 3- to 5-year-old children. We highlight several dimensions of the study pertaining to music education, including attention span, spontaneous development of playing modes, and capacity to listen analytically. We describe very encouraging preliminary results and stress the importance of using reflective interactive systems for triggering musical interest in children and creating stimulating, nonsupervised music learning environments. We conclude by setting up our research in the context of the theory of flow as an optimal experience.

REFERENCES

• 1: ADDESSI, A.-R. AND PACHET, F. 2003. Musical style replication in 3/5 years old children: experiments and analysis. Submitted to the British J. Music Education.
• 2: BROOKS, HOPKINS, NEUMANN, AND WRIGHT. 1957. An experiment in musical composition. IRE Trans. Electronic Comput. 6, 1(1957).
• 3: COPE, D. 1996. Experiments in Musical Intelligence. A-R Editions, Madison, WI, 1996.
• 4: CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. 1990. Flow, the Psychology of optimal Experience. Harper & Row, 1990.
• 5: CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper Collins, 1996.
• 6: DELALANDE, F. 1984. La musique est un jeu d'enfant. Buchet/Chastel, Paris. 1984.
• 7: DELIÈGE, I. 2003. Special issue on music similarity. Musica Scientae (Fall 2003).
• 8: Sidney Fels, Intimacy and embodiment: implications for art and technology, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM workshops on Multimedia, p.13-16, October 30-November 03, 2000, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/357744.357749]
• 9: IIZUKA, H. AND IKEGAMI, T. 2002. Simulating turn-taking behaviours with coupled dynamical recognizers. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems (University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 9th-13th Dec. 2002).
• 10: KAPLAN, F. 2001. Artificial attachment: Will a robot ever pass Ainsworth's strange situation test?. In Proceedings of Humanoids 2001: IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. S. Hashimoto, ed. 2001. 125-132.
• 11: KURZWEIL, R. 1999. The Age of Spiritual Machines. Viking Press, 1999.
• 12: MACHOVER, T. 1996. Brain opera, In Memesis: The Future of Evolution. Ars Electronica Editions, Linz, Austria.
• 13: MOGI, K. 2003. Onceness. In The Future of Learning. M. Tokoro and L. Steels, eds. IOS Press.
• 14: MUSICLAB. 2002. 6 interactive music applications for music teaching in national education. http://www.ircam.fr/produits/technologies/multimedia/musiclab-e.html.
• 15: PACHET, F. 2002a The Continuator: Musical interaction with style. In Proceedings of the ICMC Conference (Sept. 2002), 211-218. Extended version in J. New Music Research 31, 4 (2003).
• 16: François Pachet, Interacting with a Musical Learning System: The Continuator, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Music and Artificial Intelligence, p.119-132, September 12-14, 2002
• 17: IEEE MultiMedia, Playing With Virtual Musicians: The Continuator in Practice, IEEE MultiMedia, v.9 n.3, p.77-82, July 2002 [doi>10.1109/MMUL.2002.1022861]
• 18: PARADISO, J. 1999. The brain opera technology: New instruments and gestural sensors for musical interaction and performance. J. New Music Research 28, 2 (1999), 130-149.
• 19: Mitchel Resnick , Amy Bruckman , Fred Martin, Pianos not stereos: creating computational construction kits, interactions, v.3 n.5, p.40-50, Sept./Oct. 1996 [doi>10.1145/234757.234762]
• 20: RINALDI, C. 2003. The joys of preschool learning. In The Future of Learning: Issues and Prospects. M. Tokoro and L. Steels eds. IOS Press, 2003.
• 21: SHANNON, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech. J. 27 (July and Oct. 1948), 379-423 and 623-656.
• 22: J. L. Triviòo-Rodriguez , R. Morales-Bueno, Using Multiattribute Prediction Suffix Graphs to Predict and Generate Music, Computer Music Journal, v.25 n.3, p.62-79, Fall 2001 [doi>10.1162/014892601753189547]
• 23: Sherry Turkle, The second self: computers and the human spirit, Simon & Schuster, Inc., New York, NY, 1984
• 24: WEINBERG, G. 1999. Expressive digital musical instruments for children. M.S. thesis. MIT Media Laboratory, 1999.
• 25: WEBSTER, P. R. 2002. Computer-based technology and music teaching and learning. In The New Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning. R. Cowell and C. Richardson eds. Oxford University Press, 416-439.