ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Self-configuring localization systems: Design and Experimental Evaluation
Full text PdfPdf (261 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS) archive
Volume 3 ,  Issue 1  (February 2004) table of contents
Pages: 24 - 60  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:1539-9087
Authors
Nirupama Bulusu  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
John Heidemann  University of Southern California/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA
Deborah Estrin  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Tommy Tran  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 120,   Citation Count: 20
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/972627.972630
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Embedded networked sensors promise to revolutionize the way we interact with our physical environment and require scalable, ad hoc deployable and energy-efficient node localization/positioning.This paper describes the motivation, design, implementation, and experimental evaluation (on sharply resource-constrained devices) of a self-configuring localization system using radio beacons. We identify beacon density as an important parameter in determining localization quality, which saturates at a transition density. We develop algorithms to improve localization quality by (i) automating placement of new beacons at low densities (HEAP) and (ii) rotating functionality among redundant beacons while increasing system lifetime at high densities (STROBE).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Bahl, P. and Padmanabhan, V. N. 2000. Radar: An in-building user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2000, vol. 2. IEEE, New York, 775--84.
 
3
Bulusu, N., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2000. GPS-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine 7, 5 (Oct.), 28--34.
 
4
 
5
Cerpa, A. and Estrin, D. 2002. Ascent: Adaptive self-configuring network topologies. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2002, vol. 2. IEEE, New York.
6
 
7
Cox, I. J. 1991. Blanche---an experiment in guidance and navigation of an autonomous robot vehicle. IEEE Tracsactions on Robotics and Automation 7, 2, 193--204.
 
8
Doherty, L., Pister, K. S., and Ghaoui, L. E. 2001. Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2001, vol. 3. IEEE, Anchorage, Alaska, 1655--1663.
9
 
10
Girod, L. 2000. Development and Characterization of an Acoustic Rangefinder. Tech. Rep. USC-CS-TR-00-728, University of Southern California.
 
11
Girod, L. and Estrin, D. 2001. Robust range estimation for localization in ad hoc sensor networks. http://lecs.cs.ucla.edu/ girod/papers/NLOS.ps.
 
12
Guibas, L., Lin, D., Latombe, J. C., LaValle, S., and Motwani, R. 2000. Visibility-based pursuit evasion in a polygonal environment. International Journal of Computational Geometry Applications.
 
13
 
14
Hightower, J., Want, R., and Borriello, G. 2000. Spoton: An indoor 3d location sensing technology based on rf signal strength. UW CSE 2000-02-02, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. February.
15
 
16
Hofmann-Wellenhoff, B., Lichtenegger, H., and Collins, J. 1997. Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 4th ed.
17
 
18
Kaiser, W. J. 2000. Wins ng 1.0 transceiver power dissipation.
19
 
20
 
21
US Wireless Corporation. http://www.uswcorp.com/USWCMainPages/our.htm.
 
22
Meguerdichian, S., Koushanfar, F., Potkonjak, M., and Srivastava, M. B. 2001. Coverage problems in wireless ad hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2001. IEEE, Anchorage, Alaska.
23
24
 
25
 
26
RF Monolitithics, I. http://www.rfm.com.
 
27
Royer, E. and Toh, C. 1999. A review of current routing protocols for ad-hoc mobile wireless networks. IEEE. Personal Communications. April 1999. Citeseer.ng.nec.com/royer99review.html.
 
28
Savvides, A., Boulis, A., Kaushanafar, F., Potkonjak, M., Karavas, V., and Srivastava, M. B. 2000. Dynamic location discovery in ad-hoc wireless networks. Tech. Rep. TM-UCLA-NESL-2000-07-001, University of California at Los Angeles. July.
29
 
30
Schurgers, C., Tsiatsis, V., and Srivastava, M. B. 2002. Stem: Topology management for eneregy efficient sensor networks. In IEEE Aerospace Conference 2002, Big Sky, MT, USA.
 
31
 
32
VOR. Very high frequency omnirange. http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/VOR.htm.
 
33
Ward, A., Jones, A., and Hopper, A. 1997. A new location technique for the active office. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine 4, 5 (October), 42--47.
34
35
 
36
Ye, W., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2002. An energy efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2002, vol. 2. IEEE, New York.
 
37
Ye, W., Vaughan, R. T., Sukhatme, G. S., Heidemann, J., Estrin, D., and Mataric, M. J. 2001. Evaluating control strategies for wireless-networked robots using an integrated robot and network simulation. In Proceedings of ICRA-2001, Seoul, Korea.

CITED BY  20

Collaborative Colleagues:
Nirupama Bulusu: colleagues
John Heidemann: colleagues
Deborah Estrin: colleagues
Tommy Tran: colleagues