ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A view matcher for learning Smalltalk
Full text PdfPdf (889 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people table of contents
Seattle, Washington, United States
Pages: 431 - 437  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-201-50932-6
Authors
John M. Carroll  User Interface Institute, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY
Janice A. Singer  User Interface Institute, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY
Rachel K. E. Bellamy  User Interface Institute, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY
Sherman R. Alpert  User Interface Institute, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 13,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/97243.97320
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The View Matcher is a structured browser for Smalltalk/V. It presents a set of integrated and dynamic views of a running application, intended to coordinate and rationalize a programmer's early understanding of Smalltalk and its environment. We describe the system through two user scenarios involving exploration of the model-view-controller paradigm.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Bonar, .I. and Cunningham, R. (1988). Bridge: Tutoring the prograrruning process. In J. Psotka, D. Massey and S. Mutter (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: Lesson learned. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
3
Bruner, .I.S. (1975). The ontogenesis of language. Journal of ChiM Language, 2, I- 19.
 
4
Carroll, J.M. (1984). Minimalist training. Datamation, 30/18, November 1, 125-136.
 
5
6
 
7
Cox, I3. (1984). Message/object programming: An evolutionary change in programming technology. IEEE Software, 1(I}, 50-61.
 
8
Digitalk, Inc. (1988). Smalltalk/V 286: Objectoriented programming system.
 
9
 
10
'Shea, T., Beck, K., l lalbert, D., and Sct~mucker, K. (1986). Panel: The leamability of object-oriented programming systems. In N. Mcyrowitz (Ed.), Object.Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications: OOPSLA'86 Conference Proceedings. New York: ACM, pp. 502-503.
 
11
l~ugh, .I. (1988). l~osition paper for the panel on "l'caching O()P. In N. Meyrowitz (Ed.), Object- Oriented Programming Systerrtr, Languages, and Applications: OOPSLA'88 Conference Proceedings. New York: ACM, p. 387.
 
12
Robson, D. (1981). Object-oriented software systems. Byte, 6(8), 74-86.
 
13
Rosson, M.13. and Alpert, S.R. (1989). The cognitive consequences of object-oriented design, lluman Computer Interaction, in press.
14
15

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
John M. Carroll: colleagues
Janice A. Singer: colleagues
Rachel K. E. Bellamy: colleagues
Sherman R. Alpert: colleagues