ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Powermice and user performance
Full text PdfPdf (681 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people table of contents
Seattle, Washington, United States
Pages: 213 - 220  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-201-50932-6
Authors
Herbert D. Jellinek  Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, 3333 Coyote Hill Road, Palo Alto, CA
Stuart K. Card  Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, 3333 Coyote Hill Road, Palo Alto, CA
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 42,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/97243.97276
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Claims of increased pointing speed by users and manufacturers of variable-gain mice (“powermice”) have become rife. Yet, there have been no demonstrations of this claim, and theoretical considerations suggest it may not even be true. In this paper, the claim is tested. A search of the design space of powermice failed to find a design point that improved performance compared to a standard mouse. No setting for the gain for a constant-gain mouse was found that improved performance. No threshold setting for a variable gain mouse was found that improved performance. In fact, even gain and threshold combinations favored by powermouse enthusiasts failed to improve performance. It is suggested that the real source of enthusiasm for powermice is that users are willing to accept reduced pointing speed in return for a smaller desk footprint.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Fitts, P. M. (1954). Th~ information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of ExperimentM Psychology v. 47, no. 6, Jun 1954, pp. 103-112.
 
2
Card, S. K. (1981). The model human processor: A model for making engineering calculations of human performance. In R. Sugarman (Ed.), Proceedings, 25th Annual meeting of the Human Factors Society.
 
3
 
4
Cedarimplementors.pa (1988). Inscript documentation. On-line documentation for the Cedar programming environment.
 
5
Langolf, G. (1973) Human Motor Performance in Precise Microscopic Work- Development of Standard Data for Microscopic Assembly Work. }Ph.D. Thesis, Department of industrial Engineering, University of Michigan.
 
6
Rose, Caroline. (1985) Inside Macintosh, volume II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
 
7
Veniola, Daniel. Private communication with the author, May 17., 1988.

CITED BY  14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Herbert D. Jellinek: colleagues
Stuart K. Card: colleagues