Spreadsheet-based interactive graphics: from prototype to tool

ABSTRACT

The NoPumpG prototype [7,8] suggested that the spreadsheet model of computation could simplify the creation of some types of interactive graphical application when compared with other approaches. We report here experience in developing an enhanced follow-on system, NoPumpII, and describe three applications developed using it. We conclude that (1) the potential advantages of the spreadsheet model are realized in this application experience, (2) revisions to the prototype design have permitted an increase in the complexity and scale of applications, and (3) there remain limitations in the current design which, if redressed, would further enlarge the scope of application. More generally we conclude that alternative computational models are an important area of exploration for HCI research.

REFERENCES

• 1: Borning, A. ThingLab - A constraint oriented simulation laboratory. Xerox PARC Technical Report SSL-79-3. Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Calif. 1979.
• 2: Alan Borning, The Programming Language Aspects of ThingLab, a Constraint-Oriented Simulation Laboratory, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), v.3 n.4, p.353-387, Oct. 1981 [doi>10.1145/357146.357147]
• 3: Draper, S.W. Display managers as the basis for usermachine communication. In D.A. Norman and SoW. Draper (Eds). User Centered System Design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1981.
• 4: Dan Ingalls , Scott Wallace , Yu-Ying Chow , Frank Ludolph , Ken Doyle, Fabrik: a visual programming environment, Conference proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages and applications, p.176-190, September 25-30, 1988, San Diego, California, United States
• 5: Janzen, D.H. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests, The American Naturalist. 104, 940(Nov-Dec 1970), 501-528.
• 6: Lewis, C.H. Making interactive graphics accessible. Panel Discussion in Proceedings CHI'88 Human Factors in Computing Systems (Washington, D.C., May 15-19). ACM, New York, 1988, p. 249.
• 7: Lewis, C.H. New approaches to programming. In Memorias de114 Symposium lnternacional de Sistemas Computacionales (Monterrey, N.L., Mexico). Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico, 1989.
• 8: Lewis, C.H. NoPumpG: Creating Interactive Graphics with Spreadsheet Machinery. In Glinert, E.P. (Ed). Visual Programming Environments. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Angeles, Calif., (to appear early 1990).
• 9: Clayton Lewis , Gary Olson, Can principles of cognition lower the barriers to programming?, Empirical studies of programmers: second workshop, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1987
• 10: Michael J. O'Donnell, Equational logic as a programming language, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1985
• 11: R. Sethi, Programming Languages: Concepts & Constructs, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1988
• 12: Smith, R.B. The alternate reality kit. In Proceedings of the 1986 IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages (Dallas, Tex., June 1986). IEEE, Washington, DC, 1986, pp. 99-106.
• 13: Randall B. Smith, Experiences with the alternate reality kit: an example of the tension between literalism and magic, Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI conference on Human factors in computing systems and graphics interface, p.61-67, April 05-09, 1987, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.6 Methodology and Techniques
          Subjects: Interaction techniques

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors