ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The design space of input devices
Full text PdfPdf (921 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people table of contents
Seattle, Washington, United States
Pages: 117 - 124  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-201-50932-6
Authors
Stuart K. Card  Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, 3333 Coyote Hill Road, Palo Alto, CA
Jock D. Mackinlay  Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, 3333 Coyote Hill Road, Palo Alto, CA
George G. Robertson  Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, 3333 Coyote Hill Road, Palo Alto, CA
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 203,   Citation Count: 34
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/97243.97263
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A bewildering variety of devices for communication from humans to computers now exists on the market. In order to make sense of this variety, and to aid in the design of new input devices, we propose a framework for describing and analyzing input devices. Following Mackinlay's semantic analysis of the design space for graphical presentations, our goal is to provide tools for the generation and test of input device designs. The descriptive tools we have created allow us to describe the semantics of a device and measure its expressiveness. Using these tools, we have built a taxonomy of input devices that goes beyond earlier taxonomies of Buxton & Baecker and Foley, Wallace, & Chan. In this paper, we build on these descriptive tools, and proceed to the use of human performance theories and data for evaluation of the effectiveness of points in this design space. We focus on two figures of merit, footprint and bandwidth, to illustrate this evaluation. The result is the systematic integration of methods for both generating and testing the design space of input devices.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Albert, A., (1982). The effect of graphic input devices on performance in a cursor positioning task. Proceedings of ~he H~man Factors Society- ~6th An~ua! Meeting, pp. 54-58.
2
 
3
4
 
5
Card, S.K., English, W.K., & Burr, B.J. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics P1, 601-613.
 
6
Card, S.K. (1989). Human factors and artificial intelligence. In P.A. H anccock & M.H. Chignell (Eds.), Intelligent interfaces: theory, research and design. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North- Holland).
 
7
English, W. K., Engelbart, D. C., & Berman, M. L. (1967). Display-selection techniques for text manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics HFE-8, 5-15.
 
8
Epps, B., Snyder, H., & Mutol, W. (1986). Comparison of six cursor devices on a target acquisition task. Proceedings of the Society for Information Display, pp. 302-5.
 
9
Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47, 381-391.
 
10
 
11
Karat, j., McDonald, J., & Anderson, M. (1985). A comparison of selection techniques: touch panel, mouse and keyboard. In B. Shacket (Ed.), Human- Computer interaction- INTERACT 84, pp. 189- 193.
 
12
Langolf, G. D. (1973). Human motor performance in precise microscopic work. PdD dissertation. University of Michigan. Also published by the MTM Association, Fairlawn, New Jersey, 1973.
 
13
14
 
15
Mackinlay, J.D., Card, S.K., & Robertson, G.G. (in press). A semantic analysis of the design space of input devices. To appear in Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum.
16
17
 
18
19
 
20
Sheridan, T.B. (1984). Supervisory control of remote manipulators, vehicles and dynamic pro- ~esses" experiments in command and display aiding. Advances in Man.Machine System Research, I, 49-137, JAI Press.
 
21
Siewiorek, D., Bell, G., & Newell, A. (1981). Computer structures. New York: McGraw-Hill.
 
22
Tanner, P. P. & Buxton, W. A. S. (1985). Some issues in future UIMS development. In G. E. Pfaff (ed.), User interface management systems, (pp. 67- 79), New York: Springer-Verlag.
23
 
24
Welford, A. T. (1968). Fundamentals of skill. London: Methuen.
 
25
Whitefield, D., Ball, R., & Bird, J. (1983). Some comparisons of on-display and off-display touch input devices for interaction with computer generated displays. Ergonomics, 26(11), pp. 1033-1053.
 
26
Zwicky, F. (1967) The morphological approach to discovery, invention, research, and construction. In F. Zwicky & A. G. Wilson (Eds.), New methods of thought and procedure. Springer-Verlag (New York).

CITED BY  34

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stuart K. Card: colleagues
Jock D. Mackinlay: colleagues
George G. Robertson: colleagues