| Using a knowledge analysis to predict conceptual errors in text-editor usage |
| Full text |
Pdf
(860 KB)
|
| Source
|
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people
table of contents
Seattle, Washington, United States
Pages: 91 - 98
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-201-50932-6
|
|
Authors
|
|
Richard M. Young
|
MRC Applied Psychology Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 2EF, U.K.
|
|
Joyce Whittington
|
MRC Applied Psychology Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 2EF, U.K.
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 15, Citation Count: 3
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The knowledge analysis of a device and a task, when written in an external Instruction Language and translated into rules for a programmable cognitive architecture, enables a designer to predict conceptual errors in device usage. This kind of prediction lies outside the scope of GOMS-based models. The cognitive architecture, which is referred to as a “Programmable User Model” (PUM), incorporates a limited problem-solving capability based upon means-ends analysis and multiple problem spaces. The example presented, concerning a simple text editor, illustrates the application of a PUM and demonstrates that a correct description of local knowledge does not necessarily lead to correct behaviour. This can serve to alert the designer to difficulties with the usability of a proposed interface.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Kieras, D. E. & Poison, P. G. (1985) An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22,365-394.
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Moran, T. P. (1981) The Command Language Grammar: A representation for the user interface of interactive computer systems. International Journal of Man- Machine Studies, 15, 3-50.
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Olson, J. R. & Nilsen, E. (1988) Analysis of the cognition involved in spreadsheet software interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 3,309-349.
|
| |
11
|
Payne, S. J. (1987) Complex problem spaces: Modelling the knowledge needed to use interactive devices. In H.-J. Bullinger & B. Shackel (Eds.) Human-Computer Interaction---INTERACT'87. Elsevier.
|
| |
12
|
Payne, S. J. (1989) A notation for reasoning about learning. In J. Long & A. Whitefield (Eds.) Cognitive Ergonomics and Human-Computer Interaction, 134- 165. Cambridge University Press.
|
| |
13
|
Poison, P. G. (1988) The consequences of consistent and inconsistent interfaces. In R. Guindon fEd.) Cognitive Science and its Applications for Human Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
 |
14
|
Peter G. Polson , Susan Bovair , David Kieras, Transfer between text editors, Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI conference on Human factors in computing systems and graphics interface, p.27-32, April 05-09, 1987, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
| |
15
|
Waldrop, M. M. (1988) Toward a unified theory of cognition. Science, 241, 27-29; Soar: A unified theory of cognition? Science, 241,296-298.
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
CITED BY 3
|
|
Bonnie John , Alonso Vera , Michael Matessa , Michael Freed , Roger Remington, Automating CPM-GOMS, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|