| Measuring the true cost of command selection: techniques and results |
| Full text |
Pdf
(620 KB)
|
| Source
|
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people
table of contents
Seattle, Washington, United States
Pages: 19 - 26
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-201-50932-6
|
|
Authors
|
|
R. F. Dillon
|
Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6
|
|
Jeff D. Edey
|
Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6
|
|
Jo W. Tombaugh
|
Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11, Downloads (12 Months): 45, Citation Count: 10
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
A technique that measures the impact of command selection on task time and errors is described. Users were timed while performing a drawing task, then while performing the same task with interpolated command selections. The difference between these times, consisting of both the time to select the command and to resume drawing, is the time cost of command selection. Several interface configurations were evaluated with this method including selected combinations of single mouse, two mice, voice and touch. Touch and voice input resulted in faster command selection times (approximately 1 sec) than any of the mouse conditions (approximately 3 sec).
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Buxton, W. There's more to interaction than meets the eye: Some issues in manual input. In Norman, D.A. and Draper, S.W. (Eds), User centered system design: New perspectives on human computer interaction, Erlbaum, t-Iillsdale, NJ, 1986, pp. 319-337.
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
J. Callahan , D. Hopkins , M. Weiser , B. Shneiderman, An empirical comparison of pie vs. linear menus, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.95-100, May 15-19, 1988, Washington, D.C., United States
[doi> 10.1145/57167.57182]
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
R. L. Potter , L. J. Weldon , B. Shneiderman, Improving the accuracy of touch screens: an experimental evaluation of three strategies, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.27-32, May 15-19, 1988, Washington, D.C., United States
[doi> 10.1145/57167.57171]
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
CITED BY 10
|
|
Paul Kabbash , William Buxton , Abigail Sellen, Two-handed input in a compound task, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, p.417-423, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yang Li , Ken Hinckley , Zhiwei Guan , James A. Landay, Experimental analysis of mode switching techniques in pen-based user interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel L. Odell , Richard C. Davis , Andrew Smith , Paul K. Wright, Toolglasses, marking menus, and hotkeys: a comparison of one and two-handed command selection techniques, Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Graphics interface, p.17-24, May 17-19, 2004, London, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
Ken Hinckley , Francois Guimbretiere , Patrick Baudisch , Raman Sarin , Maneesh Agrawala , Ed Cutrell, The springboard: multiple modes in one spring-loaded control, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenrick Kin , Maneesh Agrawala , Tony DeRose, Determining the benefits of direct-touch, bimanual, and multifinger input on a multitouch workstation, Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009, May 25-27, 2009, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
|
|