Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

ABSTRACT

Adequately providing fault tolerance while using network capacity efficiently is a major topic of research in optical networks. In order to improve the network utilization, grooming of low-rate connections in optical networks has been usually performed at the edge of the network. However, in all-optical networks once a channel is assigned, its entire capacity is dedicated to the users independently of its grooming capabilities. As current users don't usually require such big capacities, bandwidth inefficiencies still occur. In this paper we address this issue introducing unlimited grooming per link (UGPL), a new restoration mechanism for opaque mesh optical networks that grooms connections on a per-link basis. Simulation results show that UGPL provides the best bandwidth efficiency and the best blocking probability compared to traditional 1 + 1 protection and 1 : N end-to-end sharing schemes. Furthermore, we show that the 1 : N end-to-end restoration scheme provides no benefits over the simpler and faster 1 + 1 protection scheme.

REFERENCES

• 1: 1. Rajagopalan B. et al. IP over optical networks: a framework, IETF Internet draft, 2002.
• 2: 2. Mannie E. et al. Generalized multi-protocol label switching (GMPLS) architecture, IETF Internet draft, 2001.
• 3: 3. Huang H, Copeland JA. Hybrid wavelength and sub-wavelength routed optical networks. IEEE GLOBECOM 2001; 4: 2119-2123.
• 4: 4. Assi C, Ye Y, Shami A, Dixit S, Ali MA. On the merit of IP/MPLS protection/restoration in IP over WDM networks. IEEE GLOBECOM 2001; 1: 65-69.
• 5: 5. Zhu K, Mukherjee B. Traffic grooming in an optical WDM mesh network. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 2002; 20(1): 122-133.
• 6: 6. Doverspike R, Yates J. Challenges for MPLS in optical network restoration. IEEE Communications Magazine 2001; 39(2): 89-96.
• 7: 7. Tomsu P, Schmutzer C. Next Generation Optical Networks: The Convergence of IP Intelligence and Optical Technologies. Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 2002.
• 8: 8. Hahm J. et al. Restoration mechanisms and signaling in optical networks. IETF Internet draft, 2001.
• 9: 9. Li G. et al. RSVP-TE extensions for shared-mesh restoration in transport networks. IETF Internet draft, 2001.
• 10: 10. The National Science Foundation Network (NSFNET). URL: http://moat.nlanr.net/INFRA/NSFNET.html.
• 11: 11. Ashwood-Smith P. et al. Generalized MPLS--signaling functional description. IETF Internet draft, 2002.
• 12: 12. Zang H, Jue JP, Mukherjee B/A review of routing and wavelength assignment approaches for wavelength-routed optical WDM networks. Optical Networks Magazine 2000; 1: 47-60.
• 13: 13. Assi C, Shami A, Ali MA, Kurtz R, Guo D. Optical networking and real-time provisioning: an integrated vision for the next-generation Internet. IEEE Network magazine 2001; 14: 36-45.
• 14: 14. Kompella K, Rekhter Y, Berger L. Link bundling in MPLS traffic engineering. IETF Internet draft, 2002.
• 15: 15. Ho P, Mouftah HT. A framework of scalable optical metropolitan networks for improving survivability and class of service. IEEE Network Magazine 2002; 16: 29-35.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.3 Network Operations
          Subjects: Network management

Additional Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.1 Network Architecture and Design
          Subjects: Network topology
      C.2.5 Local and Wide-Area Networks
          Subjects: High-speed (e.g., FDDI, fiber channel, ATM)
  C.4 PERFORMANCE OF SYSTEMS
      Subjects: Fault tolerance

General Terms:
Experimentation, Management, Reliability, Theory