ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
CS++: content is not enough
Full text PdfPdf (102 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
Norfolk, Virginia, USA
SESSION: CS: other points of view table of contents
Pages: 422 - 426  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-798-2
Also published in ...
Authors
Roger Boyle  University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Martyn Clark  University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/971300.971443
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

University education in computer science requires that students learn something of the nature of the discipline. We argue that, in addition to content knowledge, two of the many things the educated computer scientist might know about are the computer science pantheon and the metaphorical structure of the discipline's technical language.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ACM. Computing curricular 2001. available at: http://www.computer.org/education/cc2001/final/index.htm {accessed 5.9.03}, 2001.
 
2
J. Banville. Review of 'Isaac Newton' by James Gleick (Fourth Estate). The Guardian, Saturday August 30th 2003.
 
3
C. Bazerman. What written knowledge does: three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11:361--387, 1981.
 
4
T. Becher. Academic tribes and territories. SRHE/Open University Press, Buckingham, 1989.
 
5
T. Becher. Physicists on physics. Studies in Higher Education, 15(1):3--20, 1990.
 
6
T. Becher and P. Trowler. Academic Tribes and Territories. SRHE, second edition, 2001.
 
7
R. M. Belbin. Management Teams - Why they succeed or fail. Butterworth Heinemann, 1981.
 
8
M. Blaug. Great Economists before Keynes. Elgar, 1986.
 
9
M. Blaug. Great Economists since Keynes. Elgar, 1986.
 
10
R. Boyle. Who's famous? Available at http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/roger/Famous.
 
11
R. Boyle. Who shall we put on the postage stamps? Technical Report 2003.10, School of Computing, University of Leeds, 2003. at http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/research/pubs/reports.shtml.
 
12
B. Clark. Academic culture. Working Paper No. 42, Yale University Higher Education Group, 1980.
 
13
E. Dijkstra. On the cruelty of really teaching Computer Science. Communications of the ACM, 32:1398--1404, 1989.
 
14
A. Douglas. The state of the art - (b) computers in British universities. The Computer Journal, 2:100--102, 1959.
 
15
M. Durrani. Physics: past present and future. Physics World, Unnumbered, December 1999. Available at http://physicsweb.org/toc/world {accessed 9.9.03}.
16
 
17
E. Garfield. What's in a name? the eponymic route to immortality. Essays of an Information Scientist, 6:384--395, 1983.
 
18
G. Gibbs. Are the pedagogies of the disciplines really different? In C. Rust, editor, Proceedings of the 7th International Improving Student Learning Symposium, pages 41--51, September 1999.
 
19
L. Graham, W. Lepenies, and P. Weingart, editors. Functions and uses of disciplinary histories. Reidel, 1983. Introduction.
 
20
F. Harackiewicz, L. Chevalier, and S. Palmer. Notable engineers: A project book. In Proc. International Conference on Engineering Education, ICEE 2001, Oslo, Norway, August 2001.
 
21
M. Henwood and I. Rival. Eponymy in mathematical nomenclature: What's in a name, and what should be? The Mathematical Intelligencer, 2:204--205, 1979.
22
23
 
24
G. Lakoff. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony, editor, Metaphor and thought, pages 202--251. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
 
25
G. Lakoff and M. Johnson. he metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4:195--208, 1980.
 
26
J. Langer. Teaching disciplinary thinking in academic coursework. In J. Mangineri and C. Block, editors, Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students, pages 81--109. Harcourt Brace, New York, 1994.
 
27
 
28
R. Merton. Priorities in scientific discovery. American Sociological Review, 22(6):635--659, 1957.
 
29
G. Morgan. Images of organization. Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1997.
 
30
E. Redish. Physics on the money, 2001 (last modified). http://www2.physics.umd.edu/~redish/Money/, {accessed 15.4.2002}.
 
31
J. Reinhardt. Physics-related stamps, 2002 (last modified). http://www.th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~jr/physstamps.html, {accessed 15.4.2002}.
 
32
L. Ridener. Dead sociologists society, 1998. http://www2.pfeiffer.edu/~lridener/DSS/DEADSOC.HTML {accessed 15.4.2002}.
 
33
L. Ridener. The good, the bad, and the ugly in cyberspace: Ups and downs of the dead sociologists' society. In Procedings of the World Congress of Sociology, Montreal, Canada, July 27th 1998. http://www2.pfeiffer.edu/~lridener/DSS/goodbad.html {accessed 9.9.03}.
 
34
 
35
Times newspaper. Obituary for Edsger Dijkstra, 9th August 2002. London.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Roger Boyle: colleagues
Martyn Clark: colleagues