ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Student culture vs group work in computer science
Full text PdfPdf (110 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
Norfolk, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Paired programming/ collaborative learning table of contents
Pages: 12 - 16  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-798-2
Also published in ...
Authors
William M. Waite  University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
Michele H. Jackson  University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
Amer Diwan  University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
Paul M. Leonardi  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 77,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/971300.971308
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Our industrial advisory boards tell us that our students are well prepared technically, but they lack important group work skills. Simply adding project courses and requiring that assignments be done in groups has not improved the situation. A careful study of student culture in Computer Science has uncovered barriers to collaboration, which can be overcome only by pervasive changes in the way we approach our curriculum.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. L. Johnson Abercrombie. The Anatomy of Judgement. Hutchinson, London, 1960.
2
 
3
C. R. Bantz. Understanding Organizations: Interpreting Organizational Communication Cultures. University of South Carolina Press, 1993.
 
4
Kenneth A. Bruffee. The art of collaborative learning: Making the most of knowledgeable peers. Change, 26(3):39--44, 1994.
 
5
Louis L. Bucciarelli and Sarah Kuhn. Engineering education and engineering practice: Improving the fit. In Stephen R. Barley and Julian E. Orr, editors, Between Craft and Science, Technology and Work, pages 210--256. Cornell University Press, 1997.
 
6
 
7
Lynn Robert Carter. The personal engineering process. URL http://deming.colorado.edu/.
8
9
 
10
Robin Jeffries, Althea T. Turner, Peter G. Polson, and M. E. Atwood. The processes involved in software design. In J. R. Anderson, editor, Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition, pages 254--284. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1981.
 
11
Frank M. J. LaFasto and Carl Larson. When teams work best : 6,000 team members and leaders tell what it takes to succeed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2001.
 
12
Paul M. Leonardi. The mythos of engineering culture: A study of communicative performances and interaction. Master's thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, 2003. URL http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~pltools/pubs/Leonardi.pdf.
 
13
John Van Maanen and Stephen R. Barley. Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. In Barry M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, editors, Research in Organizational Behavior, volume 6, pages 287--365. JAI Press, 1984.
14
 
15
K. Weick. The social psychology of organizing. Addison-Wesley, 1979.

CITED BY  16


REVIEW

"Michael G. Murphy : Reviewer"

In this study, the author tried to find a successful and cost effective method for training employees in a high turnover industry, such as the hotel industry. The overriding research question was: what is the effect of multimedia-based training on  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
William M. Waite: colleagues
Michele H. Jackson: colleagues
Amer Diwan: colleagues
Paul M. Leonardi: colleagues