Remote possibilities?

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Remote possibilities?: international usability testing at a distance

Full text

Html (25 KB), Pdf

Pdf (359 KB)

Source

interactions archive
Volume 11 , Issue 2 (March + April 2004) table of contents

COLUMN: Business table of contents

Pages: 10 - 17

Year of Publication: 2004

ISSN:1072-5520

Authors

Susan Dray	Dray & Associates, Inc., Minneapolis, MN
David Siegel	Dray & Associates, Inc., Minneapolis, MN

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 21, Downloads (12 Months): 95, Citation Count: 4

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/971258.971264 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Ames, M. and Brush, A.J. Final report on remote usability studies. CRA-W Distributed Mentor Project, 2003 Available at: www.cra.org/Activities/craw/dmp/awards/2003/Ames/report.html)
	2	Bartek, V. and Cheatham, D. Experience remote usability testing, Part 1: Examine study results on the benefits and downside of remote usability testing, 2003. Available at www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/wa-rmusts1/
	3	Bartek, V. and Cheatham, D. Experience remote usability testing, Part 2: Examine the benefits and downside of remote usability testing, 2003. Available at www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-rmusts2.html
	4	Nathan Bos , Judy Olson , Darren Gergle , Gary Olson , Zach Wright, Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA [doi>10.1145/503376.503401]
	5	Dray, S. (Organizer), Cohen-Kiel, A., Siegel, D., Sturm, C., Thrift, N., and Wixon, D. Ethnography in organizations: Questions of validity and value. Panel presentation at British Computer Society-Human Computer Interaction annual conference, Bath, UK, 2003.
	6	F. S. H. Krauss, Methodology for remote usability activities: A case study, IBM Systems Journal, v.42 n.4, p.582-593, October 2003
	7	J. Scholtz, Adaptation of Traditional Usability Testing Methods for Remote Testing, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences ( HICSS-34)-Volume 5, p.5030, January 03-06, 2001
	8	Tullis, T., Fleischman, S., McNulty, M., Cianchette, C., and Bergel, M. An empirical comparison of lab and remote usability testing of Web sites. In Proceedings of Usability Professionals Association Conference, July 2002. Available at http://hci.stanford.edu/cs377/nardi-schiano/AW.Tullis.pdf
	9	Sarah Waterson , James A. Landay , Tara Matthews, In the lab and out in the wild: remote web usability testing for mobile devices, CHI '02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA [doi>10.1145/506443.506602]

CITED BY 4

	Ryan West , Katherine Lehman, Automated summative usability studies: an empirical evaluation, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada
	David G. Hendry, Public participation in proprietary software development through user roles and discourse, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.66 n.7, p.545-557, July, 2008
	Morten Sieker Andreasen , Henrik Villemann Nielsen , Simon Ormholt Schrøder , Jan Stage, What happened to remote usability testing?: an empirical study of three methods, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 28-May 03, 2007, San Jose, California, USA
	Anders Bruun , Peter Gull , Lene Hofmeister , Jan Stage, Let your users do the testing: a comparison of three remote asynchronous usability testing methods, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 04-09, 2009, Boston, MA, USA