ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Experiments with query acquisition and use in document retrieval systems
Full text PdfPdf (1.62 MB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 13th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Brussels, Belgium
Pages: 349 - 368  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-408-2
Authors
W. B. Croft  Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
R. Das  Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
U. lib de Bruxelles :
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 24
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/96749.98240
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In some recent experimental document retrieval systems, emphasis has been placed on the acquisition of a detailed model of the information need through interaction with the user. It has been argued that these “enhanced” queries, in combination with relevance feedback, will improve retrieval performance. In this paper, we describe a study with the aim of evaluating how easily enhanced queries can be acquired from users and how effectively this additional knowledge can be used in retrieval. The results indicate that significant effectiveness benefits can be obtained through the acquisition of domain concepts related to query concepts, together with their level of importance to the information need.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Croft, W. B. "Document Representation in Probabilistic Models of I_nformation Retrieval". Journal of the American Society of Infov'mation Science, 32: 451-457; 1981.
 
4
Croft, V#r. B. "Boolean Queries and Term Dependencies in Probabilistic Retrieval Models". Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37: 71-77; 1986.
 
5
Croft, W.B.; Harper, D.J. *'Using probabilistic models of document retrieval without relevaz#ce in.formation", Journal of Documentation, 35, 285-295, 1979.
 
6
 
7
 
8
FagaxL# J. Ezperiments in Automatic Phrase Indezing for Document Reirieval: A Comparison of Syntactic and Non-Syntactic Methods. Ph.D. Thesis, TR 87-868, Cornell University, Computer Science Department, 1987.
 
9
10
 
11
Harper, D.J. Relevance Feedback in Documer, t Retrieval Systems: An Evaluation of Probabilistic Strategies. Ph.D. Thesis, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 1980.
 
12
 
13
Van l#ijsbergen, C.J. "A Non-Classical Logic for Lrfformation RetrievM". Computer Journal, 29" 481-485; 1986.
 
14
l#obertson, S.E. "The methodology of information retrieval experiment". In" Spa#ck Jones, editor, Information Retrieval Ezperzment. London" Butterworths, 9-31, 1981.
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
Salton, G; V#raldstein, R.G. "Term Relevance Weights in On-Line information Retrieval", Information Processing and Management, 14, 29-35, 1978.
19
 
20
Siegel, S. Nonparametric Statistics, McGraw-Hill, 1956.
21
 
22
Spaxck 3ones, K. Automatic Keyword Classification for Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London, 1971.
 
23
Sparck :}ones, K.; Bates, K.G. Report on a design }or the 'ideal' test collection. British Library R.eport 5428, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 1977.
 
24
Spaxck Jones, K.; Webster, C. Research on Relevance 14"eighting. British Libraxy Report 5553, Computer Laboratory, University of Caxnbridge, 1980.
 
25
Tou, F.M. et al. "RABBIT: An intelligent database assistax#t". Proceedings AAAI-82, 314- 318, 1982.
 
26
Yu, C.T.; Buckley# D.; Lain, K; Salton, G. "A genera}iT#ed term dependence model in information retrievM". Inforrna$ion Technology: Research and Development, 4, 129-154, 1983.

CITED BY  24