ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Surrogate subsets: a free space management strategy for the index of a text retrieval system
Full text PdfPdf (1.44 MB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 13th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Brussels, Belgium
Pages: 211 - 226  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-408-2
Author
F. J. Burkowski  Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
U. lib de Bruxelles :
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/96749.98226
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a new data structure and an associated strategy to be utilized by indexing facilities for text retrieval systems. The paper starts by reviewing some of the goals that may be considered when designing such an index and continues with a small survey of various current strategies. It then presents an indexing strategy referred to as surrogate subsets discussing its appropriateness in the light of the specified goals. Various design issues and implementation details are discussed. Our strategy requires that a surrogate file be divided into a large number of subsets separated by free space which will allow the index to expand when new material is appended to the database. Experimental results report on the utilization of free space when the database is enlarged.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
BAY72
BAYER, R. AND MCCREIGHT, E., Organization and maintenance of large ordered indexes, Acta Informatica, vol. 1, no. 3, 1972, pp. 173-189. ~
 
BER87
 
CHR84
CHRISTODOULAKIS, S. AND FALOUTSOS, C., Design considerations for a message file server, IEEE Trans. Sofn#,are Engineering, Vol. SE-10, No. 2, Mar. 1984, pp. 201-210.
 
CHR86
 
DEF88
DEFAZIO, S. AND GREENWALD, C., The Mead information retrieval system, IEEE Compcon 88, Feb. 1988, pp. 431.
 
DEF89
DEFAZIO, S., Private communication.
FAL84
FAL85
 
FAL87D
FALOUTSOS, C. AND CHAN, R., Fast text access methods for optical disks- designs and performance comparison, UMIACS-TR-87-66, CS-TR- 1958, Dept. of Comp. Sci. and Inst. for Adv. Comp. Studies, Univ. of Maryland, Dec. 1987, 29 pages.
FAL87S
 
HAS81
HASKIN, R. L., Special purpose processors for text retrieval, Database Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, Sept. 1981, pp. 16-29.
LAR83
 
ROB79
ROBERTS, C. S., Partial-match retrieval via the method of superimposed codes, Proc. IEEE, 67,12, Dec. 1979, 1624-1642.
SAL86
STA86
 
TEO82
TSI83