|
ABSTRACT
We present a new approach for fine-grained control over users' security privileges (fast revocation of credentials) centered around the concept of an on-line semi-trusted mediator (SEM). The use of a SEM in conjunction with a simple threshold variant of the RSA cryptosystem (mediated RSA) offers a number of practical advantages over current revocation techniques. The benefits include simplified validation of digital signatures, efficient certificate revocation for legacy systems and fast revocation of signature and decryption capabilities. This paper discusses both the architecture and the implementation of our approach as well as its performance and compatibility with the existing infrastructure. Experimental results demonstrate its practical aspects.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Bellare, M., Canetti, R., and Krawczyk, H. 1997. HMAC: Keyed-hashing for message authentication. Internet Request for Comment RFC 2104, Internet Engineering Task Force. Feb.
|
| |
3
|
Bellare, M. and Rogaway, P. 1996. The exact security of digital signatures: How to sign with rsa and rabin. In Advances in Cryptology---EUROCRYPT '96, U. Maurer, Ed. Number 1070 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. International Association for Cryptologic Research, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany.
|
| |
4
|
Bellare, M. and Sandhu, R. 2001. The security of practical two-party rsa signature schemes, http://www.cs.ucsd.edu/users/mihir/papers/splitkey.html.
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Boyd, C. 1989. Digital multisignatures. Cryptography and Coding, 241--246.
|
| |
8
|
Canetti, R. and Goldwasser, S. 1999. An efficient threshold public key cryptosystem secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack. In Advances in Cryptology---EUROCRYPT '99, J. Stern, Ed. Number 1592 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. International Association for Cryptologic Research, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany.
|
| |
9
|
Chaum, D. 1983. Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In Advances in Cryptology---CRYPTO '82, R. L. Rivest, A. Sherman, and D. Chaum, Eds. Plenum Press, New York, 199--203.
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
Ding, X. and Tsudik, G. 2003. Simple identity-based encryption with mediated RSA. In Progress in Cryptology---CT-RSA 2003. LNCS 2612. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany.
|
 |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
Gemmel, P. 1997. An introduction to threshold cryptography. RSA CryptoBytes 2, 7.
|
| |
15
|
Goodrich, M., Tamassia, R., and Schwerin, A. 2001. Implementation of an authenticated dictionary with skip lists and commutative hashing. In Proceedings of DARPA DISCEX II.
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
RSA Labs. 2002. PKCS #1v2.1: RSA cryptography standard. Tech. rep., RSA Laboratories. June.
|
 |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
Myers, M., Ankney, R., Malpani, A., Galperin, S., and Adams, C. 1999. RFC 2560: Internet public key infrastructure online certificate status protocol---OCSP.
|
| |
24
|
Naor, M. and Nissim, K. 2000. Certificate revocation and certificate update. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Comm. 18, 4 (Apr.), 561--570.
|
| |
25
|
Neuman, C. and Ts'o, T. 1994. Kerberos: An authentication service for computer networks. IEEE Computer 32, 9 (September).
|
| |
26
|
Nicolosi, A., Krohn, M., Dodis, Y., and Mazières, D. 2003. Proactive two-party signatures for user authentication. In Symposium on Network and Distributed Systems Security (NDSS '03). Internet Society, San Diego, CA.
|
| |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
Shoup, V. and Gennaro, R. 1998. Securing threshold cryptosystems against chosen ciphertext attack. In Advances in Cryptology---EUROCRYPT '98, K. Nyberg, Ed. Number 1403 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. International Association for Cryptologic Research, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, 1--16.
|
|