What's at stake in MGM v. Grokster?

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

What's at stake in MGM v. Grokster?

Full text

Html (30 KB), Pdf

Pdf (94 KB)

Source

Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 47 , Issue 2 (February 2004) table of contents
Information cities

COLUMN: Legally speaking table of contents

Pages: 15 - 20

Year of Publication: 2004

ISSN:0001-0782

Author

Pamela Samuelson

University of California at Berkeley

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 68, Citation Count: 1

Additional Information:

abstract references cited by index terms review collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/966389.966405 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Seeking to balance the needs of copyright holders and technology developers.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Brief amicus curiae of forty intellectual property professors in support of affirmance of MGM v. Grokster; www.sims.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers/.
	2	Fisher, W. An alternative compensation system. In Promises to Keep: Technology, Law and the Future of Entertainment (forthcoming 2004 Stanford University Press); www.tfisher.org.
	3	Lardner, J. Fast Forward (1987), 297--300.
	4	Netanel, N.W. Impose a noncommercial use levy to allow free peer-to-peer file sharing, Harvard J. Law & Tech. (2003); www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/nnetanel/Levies_chapter.pdf.
	5	Peer-to-peer piracy on university campuses. Testimony of hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property of the House Judiciary Committee, 108th Cong., 1st Sess., Feb. 26, 2003; commdocs.house.gov/committees/judiciary/hju85286.000/hju85286_0f.htm.
	6	U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Copyright and Home Copying: Technology Challenges the Law (Oct. 1989).

CITED BY

Jerald Hughes , Karl R. Lang , Roumen Vragov, An analytical framework for evaluating peer-to-peer business models, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, v.7 n.1, p.105-118, April, 2008

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
K. Computing Milieux
K.5 LEGAL ASPECTS OF COMPUTING
K.5.1 Hardware/Software Protection

Additional Classification:
K. Computing Milieux
K.5 LEGAL ASPECTS OF COMPUTING
K.5.2 Governmental Issues
K.5.m Miscellaneous

REVIEW

"Gregory M. Aharonian : Reviewer"

The authors develop a conceptual model for e-business (EB) adoption, based on a technology-organization-environment framework from technology innovation and information systems (IS) literature. Six adoption predictors (P) are identified, and six c more...

Collaborative Colleagues:

Pamela Samuelson: colleagues

Adobe Acrobat

QuickTime

Windows Media Player

Real Player