What role can adaptive support play in an adaptable system?

ABSTRACT

As computer applications become larger with every new version, there is a growing need to provide some way for users to manage the interface complexity. There are three different potential solutions to this problem: 1) an adaptable interface that allows users to customize the application to suit their needs; 2) an adaptive interface that performs the adaptation for the users; or 3) a combination of the adaptive and adaptable solutions, an approach that would be suitable in situations where users are not customizing effectively on their own. In this paper we examine what it means for users to engage in effective customization of a menu-based graphical user interface. We examine one aspect of effective customization, which is how characteristics of the users' tasks and customization behaviour affect their performance on those tasks. We do so by using a process model simulation based on cognitive modelling that generates quantitative predictions of user performance. Our results show that users can engage in customization behaviours that vary in efficiency. We use these results to suggest how adaptive support could be added to an adaptable interface to improve the effectiveness of the users' customization.

REFERENCES

• 1: Stuart K. Card , Allen Newell , Thomas P. Moran, The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1983
• 2: G. Fischer. Shared knowledge in cooperative problem-solving systems - integrating adaptive and adaptable components. In Adaptive User Interfaces, pages 49--68. Elsevier Science Publishers, 1993.
• 3: K. Hook. Steps to take before intelligent user interfaces become real. Interacting with Computers, 12:409--426, 2000.
• 4: Anthony Jameson, Adaptive interfaces and agents, The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 2002
• 5: Anthony Jameson , Eric Schwarzkopf, Pros and Cons of Controllability: An Empirical Study, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, p.193-202, May 29-31, 2002
• 6: Bonnie E. John , David E. Kieras, Using GOMS for user interface design and evaluation: which technique?, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.3 n.4, p.287-319, Dec. 1996 [doi>10.1145/235833.236050]
• 7: David E. Kieras , Scott D. Wood , Kasem Abotel , Anthony Hornof, GLEAN: a computer-based tool for rapid GOMS model usability evaluation of user interface designs, Proceedings of the 8th annual ACM symposium on User interface and software technology, p.91-100, November 15-17, 1995, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/215585.215700]
• 8: T. K. Landauer , D. W. Nachbar, Selection from alphabetic and numeric menu trees using a touch screen: breadth, depth, and width, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.73-78, April 1985, San Francisco, California, United States
• 9: E. Lee and J. MacGregor. Minimizing user search time in menu retrieval systems. Human Factors, 27:157--162, 1985.
• 10: Wendy E. Mackay, Triggers and barriers to customizing software, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, p.153-160, April 27-May 02, 1991, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/108844.108867]
• 11: I. Scott MacKenzie, Movement time prediction in human-computer interfaces, Human-computer interaction: toward the year 2000, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1995
• 12: Joanna Lynn Mcgrenere , Ronald Baecker , Kellogg Booth, The design and evaluation of multiple interfaces: a solution for complex software, 2002
• 13: Joanna McGrenere , Ronald M. Baecker , Kellogg S. Booth, An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA [doi>10.1145/503376.503406]
• 14: Kent L. Norman , Ben Shneiderman, The Psychology of Menu Selection: Designing Cognitive Control at the Human/Computer Interface, Greenwood Publishing Group Inc., Westport, CT, 1991
• 15: Reinhard Oppermann, Adaptively supported adaptability, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.40 n.3, p.455-472, March 1994 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1994.1021]
• 16: Kyparisia A. Papanikolaou , Maria Grigoriadou , Harry Kornilakis , George D. Magoulas, Personalizing the Interaction in a Web-based Educational Hypermedia System: the case of INSPIRE, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, v.13 n.3, p.213-267, August 2003 [doi>10.1023/A:1024746731130]
• 17: Ben Shneiderman , Pattie Maes, Direct manipulation vs. interface agents, interactions, v.4 n.6, p.42-61, Nov./Dec. 1997 [doi>10.1145/267505.267514]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation)

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology

General Terms:
Human Factors

Keywords:
GOMS, adaptable interfaces, adaptive interfaces, cognitive modelling, customization, mixed-initiative, user modelling