ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Designing example-critiquing interaction
Full text PdfPdf (412 KB)
Source International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
Funchal, Madeira, Portugal
SESSION: User modeling I table of contents
Pages: 22 - 29  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-815-6
Authors
Boi Faltings  Swiss Federal Institute of Technology(EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Pearl Pu  Swiss Federal Institute of Technology(EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Marc Torrens  Swiss Federal Institute of Technology(EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Paolo Viappiani  Swiss Federal Institute of Technology(EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 49,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/964442.964449
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In many practical scenarios, users are faced with the problem of choosing the most preferred outcome from a large set of possibilities. As people are unable to sift through them manually, decisions support systems are often used to automatically find the optimal solution. A crucial requirement for such a system is to have an accurate model of the user's preferences.Studies have shown that people are usually unable to accurately state their preferences up front, but are greatly helped by seeing examples of actual solutions. Thus, several researchers have proposed preference elicitation strategies based on example critiquing. The essential design question in example critiquing is what examples to show users in order to best help them locate their most preferred solution.In this paper, we analyze this question based on two requirements. The first is that it must stimulate the user to express further preferences by showing the range of alternatives available. The second is that the examples that are shown must contain the solution that the user would consider optimal if the currently expressed preference model was complete so that he select it as a final solution.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C. Boutilier, R. Brafman, C. Geib, and D. Poole: "A Constraint-Based Approach to Preference Elicitation and Decision Making," AAAI Spring Symposium on Qualitative Decision Theory, Stanford, 1997.
 
2
 
3
G. Carenini and D. Poole: "Constructed Preferences and Value-focused Thinking: Implications for AI research on Preference Elicitation," AAAI-02 Workshop on Preferences in AI and CP: symbolic approaches - Edmonton, Canada, 2002.
 
4
J. Doyle and R. Thomason: "Background to qualitative decision theory," AI Magazine 20(2), Summer 1999.
 
5
B. Faltings, M. Torrens and P. Pu: "Solution generation with qualitative models of preferences," to appear in Computational Intelligence, special issue on qualitative decision theory, 2004, available at http:\\liawww.epfl.ch\~ faltings\compint-2004.pdf.
 
6
V. Ha and P. Haddawy: "Problem-focused incremental elicitation of multiattribute utility models," 13th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 215--222, August 1997.
 
7
V. Ha and P. Haddawy: "Toward Case-Based Preference Elicitation: Similarity Measures on Preference Structures," 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 1998.
 
8
R.Keeney and H. Raiffa: "Decision with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs," Cambridge University Press, 1976.
 
9
R. Keeney: "Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making," Harvard University Press, 1992.
 
10
G. Linden, S. Hanks, and N. Lesh: "Interactive assessment of user preference models: The automated travel assistant," In Proceedings of User Modeling '97, 1997.
 
11
J.W. Payne, J.R. Bettman and E.J. Johnson: "The Adaptive Decision Maker," Cambridge University Press, 1993.
12
13
 
14
M. Stolze: "Soft Navigation in electronic product catalogs," International Journal on Digital Libraries 3(1), pp. 60--66, 2000.
 
15
M. Torrens, R. Weigel and B. Faltings: "Java Constraint Library: bringing constraint technology on the Internet using the Java language," Workshop on Constraints and Agents (AAAI97), AAAI Technical Report WS-97-05, July 1997.
 
16
17

CITED BY  9

Collaborative Colleagues:
Boi Faltings: colleagues
Pearl Pu: colleagues
Marc Torrens: colleagues
Paolo Viappiani: colleagues