Case studies in admissions to and early performance in computer science degrees

ABSTRACT

We present seven case-studies of undergraduate recruitment to Computer Science courses together with analysis of students' success during the early part of their study. We focus particularly upon qualification on entry, the subjects studied in the early university curriculum, and student grades.We find that while university admissions are complex processes, there exists sufficient commonality to permit some useful comparisons. These suggest that predicting undergraduate performance on the basis of entry qualifications is fraught. Nevertheless, it seems that students who arrive at university with a record of success in earlier studies may be more likely to succeed than otherwise. In particular, good grades in pre-university study may indicate that they are more likely to do well in the mathematical part of the university curriculum. Conversely, we find nothing in entry qualifications to indicate which students will be successful in the study of programming.

REFERENCES

• 1: ACT. American College Testing programme. at http://www.act.org/ {accessed 28.8.03}, 2003.
• 2: Elizabeth S. Adams , Orit Hazzan , Hrafn Loftsson , Alison Young, International perspective of women and computer science, Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.45-46, February 19-23, 2003, Reno, Navada, USA
• 3: G. Adelmand, D. Jenkins, and S. Kemmis. Rethinking case study. In J. Bell, T. Bush, A. Fox, J. Goodey, and S. Goulding, editors, Conducting small-scale investigations in educational management, pages 93--102. Paul Chapman, London, 1984.
• 4: J. Amillo. Effects of entry and early marks on Computer Science students success at UPM. at: http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/roger/iticse03/csstudy_update.pdf {accessed 11.7.03}, 2003.
• 5: AUCC. Trends in higher education. at http://www.aucc.ca/publications/auccpubs/research/trends/trends_e.html {accessed 28.8.03}, 2002.
• 6: A. Baxter and S. Hatt. Everything must go: a study of clearing and first year progression. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 24(1):5--14, 2000.
• 7: R. Boyle and M. Clark. A-level computing: Its content and value. University of Leeds School of Computing Report No. 2002.15, 2002.
• 8: R. D. Boyle, J. E. Carter, and M. A. C. Clark. What makes them succeed? Entry, progression and graduation in Computer Science. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(1):3--18, 2002.
• 9: J. Carter and T. Jenkins. Arresting the decline. In Proceedings of HECU, Lancaster, UK, June 2001.
• 10: M. A. C. Clark and R. D. Boyle. Discipline specific preparation for university study. Teaching in Higher Education, 2003. In preparation.
• 11: L. Cohen and L. Manion. Research methods in education. Routledge, London, 1994.
• 12: J. McGrath Cohoon, Women in CS and biology, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.34 n.1, March 2002
• 13: Commission of EU Rectors, European Community. The Bologna Declaration. at http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/socrates/erasmus/guide/bologna.pdf {accessed 14.7.03}, 1999.
• 14: Dianne Hagan , Selby Markham, Does it help to have some programming experience before beginning a computing degree program?, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.32 n.3, p.25-28, Sept. 2000
• 15: HEFCE. Undergraduate non-completion in higher education in England. Technical Report 97/29, Higher Education Funding Council for England, 1997. at http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/1997/97_29.htm.
• 16: HESA. Higher Education Statistics Agency. at http://www.hesa.ac.uk/ {accessed 28.8.03}, 2003.
• 17: Lisa Jamba-Joyner , William F. Klostermeyer, Predictors for success in a discrete math course, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.35 n.2, June 2003 [doi>10.1145/782941.782983]
• 18: P. Kneale. The rise of the 'strategic student': How can we adapt to cope? In S. Armstrong, G. Thompson, and S. brown, editors, Facing up to Radical Change in Universities and Colleges, pages 119--139. Kogan Page, 1997.
• 19: A. Lizzio, K. Wilson, and R. Simons. University students' perception of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1):27--52, 2002.
• 20: S. Macrae and M. Maguire. Getting in and getting on: choosing the 'best'. In A. Hayton and A. Pacazuska, editors, Access, Participation and Higher Education: policy and practice. Kogan Page, 2002.
• 21: C. Murray. The Growth of Higher Education. at http://www.stir.ac.uk/Departments/HumanSciences/AppSocSci/SSP/Murray/ 47SYspr03/Lecture10.htm {accessed 28.8.03}, 2003.
• 22: J. Nisbet and J. Watt. Case study. In J. Bell, T. Bush, A. Fox, J. Goodey, and S. Goulding, editors, Conducting small-scale investigations in educational management, pages 72--92. Paul Chapman, London, 1984.
• 23: J. Ozga and L. Sukhnandan. Undergraduate non-completion: Developing an explanatory model. Higher Education Quarterly, 52(3):316--333, 1998.
• 24: David Lorge Parnas, Education for Computing Professionals, Computer, v.23 n.1, p.17-22, January 1990 [doi>10.1109/2.48796]
• 25: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Admissions requirements. at: http://www.rose-hulman.edu/admissions/admsrequirements.htm {accessed 10.7.03}, 2003.
• 26: Statitiska Centralbyran. Participation in education. at http://www.scb.se/statistik/uf0507/uf0507tab4Eng.asp {accessed 28.8.03}, 2003.
• 27: The College Board. The Scholastic Aptitude Test. at http://www.collegeboard.com/ {accessed 28.8.03}, 2003.
• 28: University of Calgary. Admission requirements for prospective students. at: http://www.science.ucalgary.ca/prospective/admission.htm {accessed 22.7.03}, 2003.
• 29: University of Leeds. Coursefinder 2003. at: http://tldynamic.leeds.ac.uk/ugcoursefinder/2003/ {accessed 10.7.03}, 2003.
• 30: University of Limerick. Lm051 - bachelor of science in computer systems. at: http://www.ul.ie/admissions/prospectus/Undergraduate/colleges/informatics/ LM051.html {accessed 11.7.03}, 2003.
• 31: University of Ulster. Online prospectus: Courses enrolling 2003. at: http://www.ulst.ac.uk/prospectus/course/?id=524#3 {accessed 11.7.03}, 2003.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.7 THE COMPUTING PROFESSION
      K.7.0 General

Keywords:
curricula, first-year, international program comparison, logic discrete math, programming courses, undergraduate entry