Six models for the social accountability of computing

ABSTRACT

This paper briefly examines six public policy strategies for including the "social accountability of computing". "Social accountability" denotes ways of organizing computer specialists, organized groups that develop, manufacture, sell or use computer-based systems, and their markets, so that the broader public is well served. The six models which are examined here include:1. Market arrangements2. Administrative authority3. Professional control4. Regulatory commissions to administer legislative acts5. Judical enforcement and review of legislative acts6. Citizen actionEach is applicable to a different context in which computer-based services are provided. And collectively, they span the set of policy instruments available in liberal democracies. While these models have been extensively developed and examined in a variety of settings, their appropriateness for computing is usually tacitly assumed, rather than grounded in careful analyses. Upon close inspection, each model is found to have severe problems in either its practical effectiveness or its appropriateness for computing.

REFERENCES

• 1: Elihu Gerson provided helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. This manuscript is based on a paper at the 1977 IFIP Conference help in Toronto, Ontario during August 1977. An earlier version also appeared in the IC-9 Newsletter Fall, 1977.
• 2: A. Mowshowitz, Computers and the Mechanication of Judgement, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1977
• 3: Martin, James, Future Developments in Telecommunications (2nd ed.), Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1977.
• 4: Sackman, Harold and Norman Nie, The Information Utility and Social Choice, Montvale, N.J.: AFIPA Press, 1970.
• 5: Baran, Paul, Potential Market Demand for Two-Way Information Sources in the Home, Report R-29, Institute of the Future, Menlo Park, CA: Institute of the Future, December, 1971.
• 6: Rose, Sanford, "More Bang for the Buck: The Magic of Electronic Banking", Fortune 95, 5 (1977), 202--226.
• 7: Kay, Alan and Adele Goldberg, "Personal Dynamic Media", Computer 10, 3 (March 1977) 21--42.
• 8: Rob Kling, Value conflicts and social choice in electronic funds transfer system developments, Communications of the ACM, v.21 n.8, p.642-657, Aug. 1978 [doi>10.1145/359576.359580]
• 9: One important class of exception is found in critiques of consumer culture. See The Pursuit of Loneliness by Phillop Slate, Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1970.
• 10: French, Nancy, "DP Deprives workers of Job Satisfaction, Europe Studies Show," Computer World XI, 34(August 22, 1977), 1, 4.
• 11: Kling, Rob, The Role of Computing in White Collar Work. WP-78--64 Public Research Organization, University of California-Irvine, CA (May 1978).
• 12: Rob Kling, Computers and social power, ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, v.5 n.3, p.6-11, Fall 1974 [doi>10.1145/958651.958652]
• 13: William H. Dutton , Kenneth L. Kraemer, Management utilization of computers in American local governments, Communications of the ACM, v.21 n.3, p.206-218, March 1978 [doi>10.1145/359361.359364]
• 14: Rob Kling, Automated welfare client-tracking and service integration: the political economy of computing, Communications of the ACM, v.21 n.6, p.484-493, June 1978 [doi>10.1145/359511.359528]
• 15: Crabtree, P. and Rob Kling, "DP Sales Ploys and Counter Ploys", Datamation 24, 5 (May 1978), 194--203.
• 16: Sterling, T. and K. Laudon, "The Human (and Human (and Inhuman) Side of Management Information System", Datamation 22, 11 (November 1976).
• 17: Theodor D. Sterling, Guidelines for humanizing computerized information systems: a report from Stanley House, Communications of the ACM, v.17 n.11, p.609-613, Nov. 1974 [doi>10.1145/361179.361180]
• 18: Wessel, Milton, Freedom's Edge, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1974.
• 19: A problem-list of issues concerning computers and public policy, Communications of the ACM, v.17 n.9, p.495, Sept. 1974 [doi>10.1145/361147.372793]
• 20: A seventh model, "Public enterprise" was of great interest in the U.S. and is still a valued instrument in other Western countries. Common examples include libraries and the postal service. Public enterprises are rarely proposed to provide or administer computer-based services in the U.S. However, the recent attempts by the Federal Reserve Board to administer a switching system for automated check processing exemplifies the policy too. See Selznick {32} for his classic study of a public utility, the Tennessee Valley Authority. See {45} for a broad and rich account of public enterprise as a policy instrument, and {8} for a discussion of the Fed's role in EFT developments. Since proposals for public agencies to be major providers of computer-based products and services receive little attention, we will not deal them separately. However,, portions of our discussion of regulatory commissions and market arrangements would apply to public enterprises.
• 21: Schultze, C. L., "The Public Use of the private Interest", Harpers 254, 1524 (May 1977), 43--62.
• 22: Mansfield, Edwin, Microeconomics, 2nd ed., New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 1975.
• 23: Privacy Protection study Commission, Personal Privacy in an Information Society, Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, July, 1977, Doc. No. 1977, Doc. No. 052--003--00395--3.
• 24: Rule, James, The Politics of Privacy, New York: New American Library (forthcoming).
• 25: Krier, James and Edmund Ursin, Pollution and Policy, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1977.
• 26: Rossman, Laura, "Financial industry sees FET privacy adequate", American Banker CXLT, 210 (October 28, 1976), 1, 111.
• 27: Brooks, Harvey and Raymond Bowers, "Technology: Processes of Assessment and Choice", Technology and Man's Future 2nd ed., Albert Teich (ed.), New York: St. Martins' Press, 1977.
• 28: Weber, Max, "Bureaucracy". From Max Weber, Essays in Sociology, Hans Gerth and C. Wright Mills (ed.) New York: Oxford University Press, 1974.
• 29: Perror, Charles, Complete Organizations, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing co., 1972.
• 30: See {49} and: Kling, Rob, "The Organizational Context of User-Centered Software Design", MIS Quarterly 1, 4 (December 1977), 41--52.
• 31: Here it si appropriate to emphasize the conflicts between organizational participants and their publics. There are also broad realms of co-operation with make it possible for an organization to carry on its affairs. Even between detectives and suspects one finds exchanges and cooperative negotiations carried out in a conflictual setting.
• 32: See for example: Selznick, Phillip, TVA and the Grass Roots, New York: Harper and ROW, 1966. Rogers, David. 110 Livingston Street: Politics and Bureaucracy in the New York City School System, New York: Random House, 1969.
• 33: Wilensky, Harold, "The Professionalization of Everyone?" American Journal of Sociology, (September 1964), 137--158.
• 34: Philip Kraft, Programmers and Managers: The Routinization of Computer Programming in the United States, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 1984
• 35: The occupational of computer specialists resembles that of engineers who often work within very sharply defined zones of responsibility and with little substantive power. For an account of the organization of engineering work, see: Perrucci, Robert, "Engineering: Professional Servant of power," American Behavioral Scientist, 14, 4 (March--April 1971), 492--506
• 36: Ted Sterling observes computer scientists do provide some assessment of computing problems independent of the particular interests of computer-using organizations. See {17} and {19} for sample publications. Computer ombudsman programs and providing testimony at legislative hearings illustrate more activist approaches undertaken by computer specialists outside their places of employment. However, these activities are purely voluntary, involve a small fraction of computer specialist, and cannot be relied upon for routine attention to all computing situations.
• 37: Alford, R., Health Care politics: Ideological and interest Group Barriers to Reform, Chicago: University of chicago Press, 1975.
• 38: Friedson, Eliot, Professional Dominance, New York: Atherton Press, 1970.
• 39: Etzioni, Amatai, "Alternative conception of accountability," Accountability in Health Facilities, Harry Greenfield (ed.), New York: Prager Publishers, 1975.
• 40: For a detailed account of the complex chain of markets that mediate between computer specialists and (public) consumers of computer-based information, see "the Social Dynamics of Technical Change in the Computing world", by r. Kling and E. gerson {2}.
• 41: Gotlieb, c. c. and Alan Borodin, Social Issues in Computing, New York: Academic Press 1973, and Mowshowitz, Abbe, The Conquest of will, Reading MA: Addison-Wesley, 1976.
• 42: American laws such as the Pair Credit reporting Act or state laws requiring supermarkets using Universal Product Codes to individually mark the price of each item provide relatively successful examples of legal provisions to shape computer uses in a more public interest.
• 43: Steward, Richard, "The reformation of American Administrative law", Harvard law review 88, 4 June 1975, 1669--1813.
• 44: Belair, Robert,"Less government Secrecy and More personal Privacy? Experience with the Federal Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts", the civil Liberties Review 4, 1 (may/June 1977), 10--19.
• 45: Wilcox, C. and W. Shepard, Public Policies Toward Business, Fifth (ed.) Homeward IL.: Richard D. Irwin, 1975.
• 46: Noll, Roger, Reforming Regulation, Washington, D.C.: The brookings Institution, 1971.
• 47: Yin, R. and D. Yates, Street Level Government, Report No. r1527--NSF, Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1974.
• 48: Arrow, Kenneth, Social Choice and Individual Values 2nd (ed.), New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963.
• 49: Rob Kling , Walter Scacchi , Phillip Crabtree, The social dynamics of instrumental computer use, ACM SIGSOC Bulletin, v.10 n.1, p.9-21, July 1978 [doi>10.1145/1103680.1103681]
• 50: See "Electronic Funds Transfer Systems and quality of Life" {2}.
• 51: For an example, see: Sayre K. (ed.), Values in the Electric power Industry, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977.