ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Studying the effect of similarity in online task-focused interactions
Full text PdfPdf (257 KB)
Source Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Social browsing table of contents
Pages: 321 - 329  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-693-5
Authors
Dan Cosley  University of Minnesota
Pamela Ludford  University of Minnesota
Loren Terveen  University of Minnesota
Sponsors
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 59,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/958160.958212
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Although the Internet provides powerful tools for social interactions, many tasks-for example, information-seeking-are undertaken as solitary activities. Information seekers are unaware of the invisible crowd traveling in parallel to their course through the information landscape. Social navigation systems attempt to make the invisible crowd visible, while social recommender systems try to introduce people directly. However, it is not clear whether users desire or will respond to social cues indicating the presence of other people when they are focused on a task. To investigate this issue, we created an online game-playing task and paired subjects to perform the task based on their responses to a short survey about demographics and interests. We studied how these factors influence task outcomes, the interaction process, and attitudes towards one's partner. We found that demographic similarity affected how people interact with each other, even though this information was not explicit, while similarities or differences in task-relevant interests did not. Our findings suggest guidelines for developing social recommender systems and show the need for further research into conditions that will help such systems succeed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ayman, R. (2000): 'Impact of team diversity on collaboration dynamics', in Collaborating Across Professional Boundaries, available at http://www.stuart.iit.edu/ipro/papers/pdf/ayman.pdf
 
2
Berscheid, E., and Reis, H. T. (1998): Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske et al. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol 2 (4th ed.), New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill, pp. 193--281.
3
4
 
5
 
6
Burgoon, M., and Miller, G. R. (1987). An expectancy interpretation of language and persuasion. In H. Giles & R. N. St. Clair (Eds.), Recent advances in language, communication, and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987, pp. 199--229.
 
7
 
8
Farris, G. F., & Lim F. G., Jr. (1969): Effects of Performance on Leadership, Cohesiveness, Influence, Satisfaction, and Subsequent Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 53, pp. 490--497.
 
9
Fischer, C., et al. (1977): Networks and Places: Social Relations in the Urban Setting. (with Jackson, Stueve, Gerson, Jones, and Baldassare). New York: Free Press.
 
10
Foner, L. (1996): A Multi-Agent Referral System for Matchmaking, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology, London, April 1996, pp. 245--261.
 
11
 
12
Fischer, C. (1982): To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. University of Chicago.
13
14
 
15
Jackson, R. M. (1977): Social Structure and Process in Friendship Choice, in Jackson et al, pp. 59--78.
 
16
Jaffe, J. M., Lee, Y., Huang, L., and Oshagan, H. (1995): Gender, Pseudonyms, and CMC: Masking Identities and Baring Souls. Presented at the 45th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
17
 
18
 
19
Lawrence, J. A and, Mongeau, P. (1996): The Role of Image Anticipation of Future Interaction in Computer-Mediated Impression Development. presented at the International Communications Association, Chicago, IL.
 
20
Lederer, S., Dey, A., and Mankoff, J. Everyday Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing Environments, in Ubicomp 2002 Workshop on Socially-informed Design of Privacy-enhancing Solutions in Ubiquitous Computing.
21
22
 
23
24
 
25
Putnam, R. (2000): Bowling Alone. New York, Simon & Schuster.
26
 
27
Rich, E. (1979): 'User Modeling via Stereotypes', in Cognitive Science, vol. 3, pp. 329--354.
 
28
29
 
30
Swearingen, K., and Sinha, R. (2002): Interaction Design for Recommender Systems, in Proceedings of DIS2002, ACM Press, London, 2002.
 
31
Staw, B.M. (1975): Attribution of the 'Causes' of Performance: A General Alternative Interpretation of Cross-Sectional Research on Organizations, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 13, pp. 414--32.
 
32
 
33
Van Alstyne, M. and Brynjolfsson, E. (1996): 'Electronic Communities: Global Village or Cyberbalkans?' In Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Information Systems, 1996.
 
34
Verbrugge, L. M. (1977): 'The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices', Social Forces, vol. 56, no. 2, Dec. 1977.
 
35
Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Relational Perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52--90.
36


Collaborative Colleagues:
Dan Cosley: colleagues
Pamela Ludford: colleagues
Loren Terveen: colleagues