"Breaking the code", moving between private and public work in collaborative software development

ABSTRACT

Software development is typically cooperative endeavor where a group of engineers need to work together to achieve a common, coordinated result. As a cooperative effort, it is especially difficult because of the many interdependencies amongst the artifacts created during the process. This has lead software engineers to create tools, such as configuration management tools, that isolate developers from the effects of each other's work. In so doing, these tools create a distinction between private and public aspects of work of the developer. Technical support is provided to these aspects as well as for transitions between them. However, we present empirical material collected from a software development team that suggests that the transition from private to public work needs to be more carefully handled. Indeed, the analysis of our material suggests that different formal and informal work practices are adopted by the developers to allow a delicate transition, where software developers are not largely affected by the emergent public work. Finally, we discuss how groupware tools might support this transition.

REFERENCES

• 1: Ackerman, M. S., "The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility," Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 15, pp. 179--204, 2000.
• 2: Appleton, B., Berczuk, S., et al., "Streamed Lines: Branching Patterns for Parallel Software Development," vol. 2002, 1998.
• 3: Robert S. Arnold , Shawn A. Bohner, Impact Analysis - Towards a Framework for Comparison, Proceedings of the Conference on Software Maintenance, p.292-301, September 01, 1993
• 4: John Bowers, The work to make a network work: studying CSCW in action, Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.287-298, October 22-26, 1994, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States [doi>10.1145/192844.193030]
• 5: Reidar Conradi , Bernhard Westfechtel, Version models for software configuration management, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.30 n.2, p.232-282, June 1998 [doi>10.1145/280277.280280]
• 6: Bill Curtis , Herb Krasner , Neil Iscoe, A field study of the software design process for large systems, Communications of the ACM, v.31 n.11, p.1268-1287, Nov. 1988 [doi>10.1145/50087.50089]
• 7: Paul Dourish , Victoria Bellotti, Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces, Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.107-114, November 01-04, 1992, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [doi>10.1145/143457.143468]
• 8: Paul Dourish , Sara Bly, Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.541-547, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States [doi>10.1145/142750.142982]
• 9: Clarence A. Ellis , Simon J. Gibbs , Gail Rein, Groupware: some issues and experiences, Communications of the ACM, v.34 n.1, p.39-58, Jan. 1991 [doi>10.1145/99977.99987]
• 10: Thomas Erickson , Wendy A. Kellogg, Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.7 n.1, p.59-83, March 2000 [doi>10.1145/344949.345004]
• 11: Jacky Estublier, Software configuration management: a roadmap, Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering, p.279-289, June 04-11, 2000, Limerick, Ireland [doi>10.1145/336512.336576]
• 12: Rebecca E. Grinter, Supporting articulation work using software configuration management systems, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.5 n.4, p.447-465, 1996 [doi>10.1007/BF00136714]
• 13: Rebecca E. Grinter, Recomposition: putting it all back together again, Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.393-402, November 14-18, 1998, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/289444.289514]
• 14: Rebecca E. Grinter, Using a configuration management tool to coordinate software development, Proceedings of conference on Organizational computing systems, p.168-177, August 13-16, 1995, Milpitas, California, United States [doi>10.1145/224019.224036]
• 15: Jonathan Grudin, Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organization of organizational interfaces, Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.85-93, September 26-28, 1988, Portland, Oregon, United States [doi>10.1145/62266.62273]
• 16: Heath, C., Jirotka, M., et al., "Unpacking Collaboration: the Interactional Organisation of Trading in a City Dealing Room," Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 155--170, Milan, Italy, 1993.
• 17: Heath, C. and Luff, P., "Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Control Rooms," Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 1, pp. 69--94, 1992.
• 18: David M. Hilbert , David F. Redmiles, An approach to large-scale collection of application usage data over the Internet, Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering, p.136-145, April 19-25, 1998, Kyoto, Japan
• 19: Hutchins, E., Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1995.
• 20: Hutchins, E., "How a Cockpit Remembers its Speeds," Cognitive Science, vol. 19, pp. 265--288, 1995.
• 21: Mark, G., Fuchs, L., et al., "Supporting Groupware Conventions through Contextual Awareness," European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW '97), pp. 253--268, Lancaster, England, 1997.
• 22: O'Reilly, C., Morrow, P., et al., "Improving Conflict Detection in Optimistic Concurrency Control Models," 11th International Workshop on Software Configuration Management (SCM-11), Portland, Oregon, 2003 (to appear).
• 23: Dewayne E. Perry , Harvey P. Siy , Lawrence G. Votta, Parallel changes in large-scale software development: an observational case study, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), v.10 n.3, p.308-337, July 2001 [doi>10.1145/383876.383878]
• 24: A. Podgurski , L. Clarke, The implications of program dependencies for software testing, debugging, and maintenance, Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT '89 third symposium on Software testing, analysis, and verification, p.168-178, December 13-15, 1989, Key West, Florida, United States
• 25: Anita Sarma , Zahra Noroozi , André van der Hoek, Palantír: raising awareness among configuration management workspaces, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 03-10, 2003, Portland, Oregon
• 26: Schmidt, K., "The critical role of workplace studies in CSCW," in Workplace Studies : Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, and C. Heath, Eds.: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 141--149.
• 27: Schmidt, K. and Bannon, L., "Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work," Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 1, pp. 7--40, 1992.
• 28: Abigail J. Sellen , Richard H.R. Harper, The Myth of the Paperless Office, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003
• 29: Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R., "Institutional Ecology, Translations and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology.," Social Studies of Science, vol. 19, pp. 387--420, 1989.
• 30: Mark Stefik , Gregg Foster , Daniel G. Bobrow , Kenneth Kahn , Stan Lanning , Lucy Suchman, Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings, Communications of the ACM, v.30 n.1, p.32-47, Jan. 1987 [doi>10.1145/7885.7887]
• 31: Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Second. ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE publications, 1998.
• 32: Stephanie Teasley , Lisa Covi , M. S. Krishnan , Judith S. Olson, How does radical collocation help a team succeed?, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.339-346, December 2000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/358916.359005]
• 33: Chuck Walrad , Darrel Strom, The Importance of Branching Models in SCM, Computer, v.35 n.9, p.31-38, September 2002 [doi>10.1109/MC.2002.1033025]
• 34: Steve Whittaker , Heinrich Schwarz, Meetings of the Board: The Impact of Scheduling Medium on Long Term GroupCoordination in Software Development, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.8 n.3, p.175-205, June 1999 [doi>10.1023/A:1008603001894]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS
      H.4.1 Office Automation
          Subjects: Groupware

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Computer-supported cooperative work

General Terms:
Human Factors

Keywords:
collaborative software development, private work, public work, qualitative studies