Applying heuristics to perform a rigorous accessibility inspection in a commercial context

ABSTRACT

Accessibility heuristics have been developed to compliment the accessibility guidelines. The use of Web accessibility heuristics in heuristic evaluations can ensure that a greater range of special needs will be considered, from visual to cognitive impairments. Key advantages of heuristics are conciseness, memorablity, meaningfulness and insight. The heuristics can be used effectively to understand which areas of a site have accessibility issues and can provide useful insight into how to create a solution. However, the heuristics will not tell evaluators whether a Web site conforms to legislation. Studies have confirmed the common belief that heuristics should not replace knowledge but act to cue the deeper body of knowledge defined by the guidelines; it is essential that evaluators be given accessibility education before completing a heuristic evaluation using the accessibility heuristics.

REFERENCES

• 1: Gnome Developer's Site, Accessibility: What it means? http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/access-def.html
• 2: Bobby http://bobby.watchfire.com/bobby/html/en/index.jsp
• 3: Section 508 Web Standards http://www.section508.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Content&ID=12 (part of the American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/adahom1.htm)
• 4: Disability Discrimination Act 1995 http://www.disability.gov.uk/dda
• 5: Kelley, T., The Art of Innovation. Currency Books 2001.
• 6: Industrial Designers Society of America. http://idsa.org/whatsnew/decadegallery/winners/g-oxo.html
• 7: Nielson, J., Usability Engineering. Boston: Academic Press, Inc. 1994
• 8: http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html
• 9: http://www.trg.soton.ac.uk/pti/principles.html
• 10: Gray, W. D., and Salzman, M. C., 1998 Damaged merchandise? A review of experiments that compare usability and evaluation methods. In Human-Computer Interaction, 13
• 11: Robin Jeffries , James R. Miller , Cathleen Wharton , Kathy Uyeda, User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, p.119-124, April 27-May 02, 1991, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/108844.108862]
• 12: Claire-Marie Karat , Robert Campbell , Tarra Fiegel, Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.397-404, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States [doi>10.1145/142750.142873]
• 13: IBM User Engineering, www.ibm.com/easy/userengineering
• 14: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/
• 15: Nielson, J., Beyond ALT Text: Making the Web Easy to Use for Users With Disabilities Nielsen Norman Group Report http://www.nngroup.com/reports/accessibility/
• 16: IBM Web Accessibility Checklist 3.1 http://www.ibm.com/able/accessWeb.html
• 17: Guidelines for UK Government Web Sites http://www.e-envoy.gov.uk/oee/oee.nsf/sections/Webguidelines-handbook-top/$file/handbookindex.htm
• 18: WorkTrain: The National Jobs and Learning Site http://www.worktrain.gov.uk/
• 19: UsabilityNews http://www.usabilitynews.com
• 20: British HCI Group http://www.bcs-hci.org.uk/

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  A. General Literature
  A.1 INTRODUCTORY AND SURVEY

General Terms:
Human Factors, Legal Aspects

Keywords:
IBM heuristic evaluation database, accessibility, accessibility heuristics, heuristic evaluation