ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
To buy or not to buy: mining airfare data to minimize ticket purchase price
Full text PdfPdf (214 KB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining table of contents
Washington, D.C.
SESSION: Research track table of contents
Pages: 119 - 128  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-737-0
Authors
Oren Etzioni  University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Rattapoom Tuchinda  University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Craig A. Knoblock  University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA
Alexander Yates  University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Sponsors
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 166,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/956750.956767
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

As product prices become increasingly available on the World Wide Web, consumers attempt to understand how corporations vary these prices over time. However, corporations change prices based on proprietary algorithms and hidden variables (e.g., the number of unsold seats on a flight). Is it possible to develop data mining techniques that will enable consumers to predict price changes under these conditions?This paper reports on a pilot study in the domain of airline ticket prices where we recorded over 12,000 price observations over a 41 day period. When trained on this data, Hamlet --- our multi-strategy data mining algorithm --- generated a predictive model that saved 341 simulated passengers $198,074 by advising them when to buy and when to postpone ticket purchases. Remarkably, a clairvoyant algorithm with complete knowledge of future prices could save at most $320,572 in our simulation, thus HAMLET's savings were 61.8% of optimal. The algorithm's savings of $198,074 represents an average savings of 23.8% for the 341 passengers for whom savings are possible. Overall, HAMLET saved 4.4% of the ticket price averaged over the entire set of 4,488 simulated passengers. Our pilot study suggests that mining of price data available over the web has the potential to save consumers substantial sums of money per annum.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
G. Barish and C. A. Knoblock. An efficient and expressive language for information gathering on the web. In Proceedings of the AIPS-2002 Workshop on Is there life after operator sequencing? - Exploring real world planning, pages 5--12, Tolouse, France, 2002.
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
C. Chatfield. The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1989.
 
8
W. W. Cohen. Fast effective rule induction. In A. Prieditis and S. Russell, editors, Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 115--123, Tahoe City, CA, July 9--12, 1995. Morgan Kaufmann.
 
9
F. Diebold. Elements of Forecasting. South-Western College Publishing, 2nd edition, 2000.
10
11
 
12
Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 148--156, Bari, Italy, 1996. Morgan Kaufmann.
 
13
C. W. J. Granger. Forecasting in Business and Economics. Harcourt Brace, second edition, 1989.
 
14
J. C. Hull. Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives. Prentice Hall College Div, 5th edition, 2002.
 
15
 
16
 
17
D. Lucking-Reiley, D. Bryan, N. Prasad, and D. Reeves. Pennies from ebay: The determinants of price in online auctions. Technical report, University of Arizona, 2000.
 
18
 
19
S. McCartney. Airlines Rely on Technology To Manipuate Fare Structure. Wall Street Journal, November 3 1997.
 
20
J. Moody and M. Saffell. Reinforcement learning for trading systems and portfolios. In KDD, pages 279--283, 1998.
 
21
J. Moody and M. Saffell. Minimizing downside risk via stochastic dynamic programming. In Y. S. Abu-Mostafa, B. LeBaron, A. W. Lo, and A. S. Weigend, editors, Computational Finance 1999, Cambridge, MA, 2000. MIT Press.
 
22
J. Moody and M. Saffell. Learning to trade via direct reinforcement. In IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2001.
23
 
24
H. S. Shah, N. R. Joshi, A. Sureka, and P. R. Wurman. Mining for bidding strategies on ebay. In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
 
25
 
26
K. M. Ting and I. H. Witten. Issues in stacked generalization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 10:271--289, 1999.
 
27
M. P. Wellman, D. M. Reeves, K. M. Lochner, and Y. Vorobeychik. Price prediction in a trading agent competition. Technical report, University of Michigan, 2002.
 
28


Collaborative Colleagues:
Oren Etzioni: colleagues
Rattapoom Tuchinda: colleagues
Craig A. Knoblock: colleagues
Alexander Yates: colleagues