ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Adaptive duplicate detection using learnable string similarity measures
Full text PdfPdf (240 KB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining table of contents
Washington, D.C.
SESSION: Research track table of contents
Pages: 39 - 48  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-737-0
Authors
Mikhail Bilenko  University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Raymond J. Mooney  University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Sponsors
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 202,   Citation Count: 74
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/956750.956759
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The problem of identifying approximately duplicate records in databases is an essential step for data cleaning and data integration processes. Most existing approaches have relied on generic or manually tuned distance metrics for estimating the similarity of potential duplicates. In this paper, we present a framework for improving duplicate detection using trainable measures of textual similarity. We propose to employ learnable text distance functions for each database field, and show that such measures are capable of adapting to the specific notion of similarity that is appropriate for the field's domain. We present two learnable text similarity measures suitable for this task: an extended variant of learnable string edit distance, and a novel vector-space based measure that employs a Support Vector Machine (SVM) for training. Experimental results on a range of datasets show that our framework can improve duplicate detection accuracy over traditional techniques.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
M. Bilenko and R. J. Mooney. Learning to combine trained distance metrics for duplicate detection in databases. Technical Report AI 02-296, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, Feb. 2002.
3
4
 
5
D. J. Cook and L. B. Holder. Substructure discovery using minimum description length and background knowledge. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1:231--255, 1994.
 
6
R. Durbin, S. Eddy, A. Krogh, and G. Mitchison. Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
 
7
I. P. Fellegi and A. B. Sunter. A theory for record linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64:1183--1210, 1969.
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
A. E. Monge and C. Elkan. The field matching problem: Algorithms and applications. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-96), pages 267--270, Portland, OR, Aug. 1996.
 
15
A. E. Monge and C. P. Elkan. An efficient domain-independent algorithm for detecting approximately duplicate database records. In Proceedings of the SIGMOD 1997 Workshop on Research Issues on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 23--29, Tuscon, AZ, May 1997.
 
16
U. Y. Nahm and R. J. Mooney. Using information extraction to aid the discovery of prediction rules from texts. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2000) Workshop on Text Mining, Boston, MA, Aug. 2000.
 
17
S. B. Needleman and C. D. Wunsch. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequences of two proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 48:443--453, 1970.
 
18
H. B. Newcombe, J. M. Kennedy, S. J. Axford, and A. P. James. Automatic linkage of vital records. Science, 130:954--959, 1959.
 
19
J. C. Platt. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. In A. J. Smola, P. Bartlett, B. Schölkopf, and D. Schuurmans, editors, Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, pages 185--208. MIT Press, 1999.
 
20
L. R. Rabiner. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2):257--286, 1989.
 
21
22
23
 
24
V. N. Vapnik. Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, 1998.
 
25
W. E. Winkler. The state of record linkage and current research problems. Technical report, Statistical Research Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Wachington, DC, 1999.
 
26
 
27

CITED BY  74

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mikhail Bilenko: colleagues
Raymond J. Mooney: colleagues