ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Implementing operations to navigate semantic star schemas
Full text PdfPdf (194 KB)
Source Data Warehousing and OLAP archive
Proceedings of the 6th ACM international workshop on Data warehousing and OLAP table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
SESSION: Query processing table of contents
Pages: 56 - 62  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-727-3
Authors
Alberto Abelló  University Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona
José Samos  University de Granada, Granada
Fèlix Saltor  University Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMIS: ACM Special Interest Group on Management Information Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 66,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/956060.956071
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In the last years, lots of work have been devoted to multidimensional modeling, star shape schemas and OLAP operations. However, "drill-across" has not captured as much attention as other operations. This operation allows to change the subject of analysis keeping the same analysis space we were using to analyze another subject. It is assumed that this can be done if both subjects share exactly the same analysis dimensions. In this paper, besides the implementation of an algebraic set of operations on a RDBMS, we are going to show when and how we can change the subject of analysis in the presence of semantic relationships, even if the analysis dimensions do not exactly coincide.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
A. Datta and H. Thomas. A Conceptual Model and an algebra for On-Line Analytical Processing in Data Warehouses. In Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems (WITS'97), 1997.
 
9
 
10
E. Franconi, F. Baader, U. Sattler, and P. Vassiliadis. Fundamentals of Data Warehousing, chapter Multidimensional Data Models and Aggregation. Springer, 2000. M. Jarke, M. Lenzerini, Y. Vassilious and P. Vassiliadis editors.
 
11
 
12
 
13
ISO. ISO/IEC 9075:1999: Information technology---Database languages---SQL. International Organization for Standardization, 1999.
 
14
 
15
R. Kimball. The Data Warehouse toolkit. John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
 
16
17
 
18
D. L. Moody and M. A. Kortink. From Enterprise Models to Dimensional Models: A Methodology for Data Warehouse and Data Mart Design. In Int. Workshop on Design and Management of Data Warehouses (DMDW'2000). CEUR-WS (www.ceur-ws.org), 2000.
 
19
OLAP Council.OLAP and OLAP Server Definitions. Available at the URL www.olapcouncil.org/research/glossaryly.htm,1997.
 
20
OMG. Unified Modeling Language Specification, September 2001. Version 1.4. Available at http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/01-09-67.
 
21
 
22
 
23
I.-Y. Song, W. Rowen, C. Medsker, and E.Ewen. An Analysis of Many-to-Many Relationships Between Fact and Dimension Tables in Dimensional Modeling. In Int. Workshop on Design and Management of Data Warehouses (DMDW'2001). CEUR-WS (www.ceur-ws.org), 2001.
 
24
O. Teste. Towards Conceptual Multidimensional Design in Decision Support Systems. In East-European Conf. on Advances in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS 2001), 2001.
 
25
26
 
27


Collaborative Colleagues:
Alberto Abelló: colleagues
José Samos: colleagues
Fèlix Saltor: colleagues