ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Views for light-weight Web ontologies
Full text PdfPdf (748 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Melbourne, Florida
SESSION: Web technologies and applications table of contents
Pages: 1168 - 1173  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-624-2
Authors
Raphael Volz  University of Karlsruhe, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
Daniel Oberle  University of Karlsruhe, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
Rudi Studer  University of Karlsruhe, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/952532.952760
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Semantic Web aims at easy integration and usage of content by building on a semi-structured data model where data semantics are explicitly specified through ontologies. However, ontologies and thereby ontology-based applications themselves suffer from heterogeneity. Therefore a new level of data independence is required to allow the customization of information, e.g. towards the needs of other agents, which can be achieved by exploiting database view principles. This paper addresses this issue and presents a new view mechanism for the data models underlying the Semantic Web, RDF and RDFS.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
S. Abiteboul, R. Goldman, J. McHugh, Vasilis Vassalos, and Yue Zhuge. Views for semistructured data. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Management of Semistructured Data, Tucson, Arizona, May 1997.
 
3
 
4
C. Beeri. Formal Models for object oriented databases. In Proc. 1st Intl. Conf. on Deductive and object-oriented databases, pages 370--396, 1989.
 
5
 
6
 
7
D. Brickley and R. V. Guha. Resource description framework (RDF) schema specification 1.0. Internet: <u>http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000372/, 2000</u>.
 
8
S. Decker, D. Brickley, J. Saarela, and J. Angele. A query and inference service for RDF. In QL98 - Query Languages Workshop, December 1998.
 
9
S. J. DeRose. Xquery: A unified syntax for linking and querying general xml documents. Query Languages 1998, 1998.
 
10
O. Lassila and R. Swick. Resource description framework (RDF) model and syntax specification. Internet: <u>http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/, 1999</u>.
 
11
A. Maedche, S. Staab, R. Studer, Y. Sure, and R. Volz. Seal tying up information integration and web site management by ontologies. In IEEE Data Engineering Bullelin, volume 25, March 2002.
 
12
 
13
D. Oberle and R. Volz. Implementation of an view mechanism for ontology-based metadata. Technical Report 422, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe (TH), 2002.
 
14
 
15
M. Scholl, C. Laasch, and M. Tresch. Views in Object-Oriented Databases. In Proc. 2nd Workshop on Foundations of Models and Languages of Data and Objects, pages 37--58, September 1990.
 
16
 
17

Collaborative Colleagues:
Raphael Volz: colleagues
Daniel Oberle: colleagues
Rudi Studer: colleagues