ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Greedy heuristics and an evolutionary algorithm for the bounded-diameter minimum spanning tree problem
Full text PdfPdf (627 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Melbourne, Florida
SESSION: Evolutionary computing and optimization table of contents
Pages: 747 - 752  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-624-2
Authors
Günther R. Raidl  Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
Bryant A. Julstrom  St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 35,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/952532.952678
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Given a connected, weighted, undirected graph G and a bound D, the bounded-diameter minimum spanning tree problem seeks a spanning tree on G of lowest weight in which no path between two vertices contains more than D edges. This problem is NP-hard for 4 < D < n - 1, where n is the number of vertices in G. An existing greedy heuristic for the problem, called OTTC, is based on Prim's algorithm. OTTC usually yields poor results on instances in which the triangle inequality approximately holds; it always uses the lowest-weight edges that it can, but such edges do not in general connect the interior nodes of low-weight bounded-diameter trees. A new randomized greedy heuristic builds a bounded-diameter spanning tree from its center vertex or vertices. It chooses each next vertex at random but attaches the vertex with the lowest-weight eligible edge. This algorithm is faster than OTTC and yields substantially better solutions on Euclidean instances. An evolutionary algorithm encodes spanning trees as lists of their edges, augmented with their center vertices. It applies operators that maintain the diameter bound and always generate valid offspring trees. These operators are efficient, so the algorithm scales well to larger problem instances. On 25 Euclidean instances of up to 1000 vertices, the EA improved substantially on solutions found by the randomized greedy heuristic.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Abdalla, N. Deo, and P. Gupta. Random-tree diameter and the diameter constrained MST. Congressus Numerantium, 144:161--182, 2000.
 
2
K. Bala, K. Petropoulos, and T. E. Stern. Multicasting in a linear lightwave network. In IEEE INFOCOM'93, pages 1350--1358, 1993.
 
3
 
4
G. Chartrand and O. Oellermann. Applied and Algorithmic Graph Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993.
 
5
G. Dahl. The 2-hop spanning tree problem. Technical Report 250, University of Oslo, 1997.
 
6
 
7
 
8
J. Gottlieb, B. A. Julstrom, F. Rothlauf, and G. R. Raidl. Prüfer numbers: A poor representation of spanning trees for evolutionary search. In L. Spector, E. Goodman, A. Wu, W. Langdon, H.-M. Voigt, M. Gen, S. Sen, M. Dorigo, S. Pezeshk, M. Garzon, and E. Burke, editors, Proceedings of the 2001 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pages 343--350. Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.
 
9
C. Jordan. Sur les assemblages des lignes. J. Reine Angew. Math., 70:185--190, 1869.
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
C. C. Palmer and A. Kershenbaum. Representing trees in genetic algorithms. In D. Schaffer, H.-P. Schwefel, and D. B. Fogel, editors, Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pages 379--384. IEEE Press, 1994.
 
14
R. C. Prim. Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. Bell System Technical Journal, 36:1389--1401, 1957.
 
15
G. R. Raidl. An efficient evolutionary algorithm for the degree-constrained minimum spanning tree problem. In C. Fonseca, J.-H. Kim, and A. Smith, editors, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 104--111. IEEE Press, 2000.
 
16
G. R. Raidl and B. A. Julstrom. Edge-sets: An effective evolutionary coding of spanning trees. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. To appear.
17
 
18

CITED BY  16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Günther R. Raidl: colleagues
Bryant A. Julstrom: colleagues