ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A unified security framework for networked applications
Full text PdfPdf (797 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Melbourne, Florida
SESSION: Computer security table of contents
Pages: 351 - 357  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-624-2
Authors
Joerg Abendroth  Trinity College, Dublin
Christian D. Jensen  Technical University of Denmark
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/952532.952602
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Various security models have been proposed for different types of applications and numerous types of execution environments. These models are typically reinforced by adding code to the application, which authenticates principals, authorises operations and establishes secure communication among distributed software components (e.g., clients and servers). This code is often application and context-specific, which makes it difficult to integrate an application with other each other.In this paper we propose a new unified access control mechanism that supports most of the existing security models and offers a number of additional controls that are not normally provided by security mechanisms. Moreover, the proposed mechanism integrates well with existing programming paradigms for distributed application, e.g., client/server technology and component based programming. This means that it can be seamlessly integrated with most existing distributed applications. We have implemented the proposed mechanism in a framework, that can be instantiated to implement different security models and policies. We present a qualitative evaluation that demonstrates the framework's ability to support a wide range of security policies and a preliminary performance evaluation of the framework.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
D. Bell and L. LaPadula. Secure computer systems: Mathematical foundations and model. Report MTR 2547 v2, MITRE, November 1973.
2
 
3
D. Clark and D. Wilson. A comparison of commercial and military computer security policies. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 184--194, 1987.
 
4
C. O'Halloran. A calculus of information flow. In ESORICS 90, pages 147--159, 1990.
 
5
J. Daemen and V. Rijmen. Aes proposal: Rijndael, 1998.
6
7
 
8
L. Gong. A secure identity-based capability system. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 56--63, 1989.
 
9
10
11
 
12
 
13
P. A. Karger and A. J. Herbert. An augmented capability architecture to support lattice security and traceability of access. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 2--12, 1984.
 
14
J. Kohl and C. Neuman. The kerberos network authentication service (v5). RFC 1510, Digital Equipment Corporation/ISI, September 1993.
 
15
 
16
D. A. Marriott, M. S. Sloman, and N. Yialelis. Management policy service for distributed systems. Technical Report DoC 95/10, Imperial College, London, 1995.
 
17
D. B. Marvin M. Theimer, David A. Nichols. Delegation through access control programs. In 12th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 529--536, 1992.
 
18
S. Microsystems. Jini#8482; architecture specification, version 1.2, December 2001.
 
19
B. C. Neumann. Proxy-based authorisation and accounting for distributed systems. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 283--291, May 1993.
 
20
T. S. S. of ITU. Information Technology -- Opens Systems Interconnection -- The Directory: Authentication Framework X.509. International Telecomunication Union, 1993. Standard international ISO/IEC 9594-8: 1995 (E).
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
M. Shapiro. Structure and encapsulation in distributed systems: The proxy principle. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Distributed Computer Systems, pages 198--204, 1986.
 
25
B. C. N. J. G. Steiner and J. I. Schiller. Kerberos: An authentication service for open network systems. In Winter 1988 USENIX Conference, pages 191--201, Dallas, TX, 1988.
 
26
I. Technologies. The iona iportal application server. Technical report, IONA Technologies, 1999.
 
27
M. Thompson, S. M. W Johnston, G. Hoo, K. Jackson, and A. Essiari. Certificate-based access control for widely distributed resources. In Proceedings of the Eighth USENIX Security Symposium, pages 215--228, 1999.
 
28
W. L. Tin Qian. Active capability: An application specific security and protection model. Technical report, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1996.
 
29
T. D. Tock. An extensible framework for authentication and delegation. Master's thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1994.
 
30
 
31


Collaborative Colleagues:
Joerg Abendroth: colleagues
Christian D. Jensen: colleagues