ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A fast and effective steganalytic technique against JSteg-like algorithms
Full text PdfPdf (476 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Melbourne, Florida
SESSION: Computer security table of contents
Pages: 307 - 311  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-624-2
Authors
Tao Zhang  University of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou, P.R. China
Xijian Ping  University of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou, P.R. China
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 59,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/952532.952595
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Detection of hidden messages in images, also known as image steganalysis, is of great significance to network information security. In this paper, we propose a fast and effective steganalytic technique based on statistical distributions of DCT coefficients which is aimed at two kinds of popular JSteg-like steganographic systems, sequential JSteg and random JSteg for JPEG images. Our approach can not only determine the existence of hidden messages in JPEG images reliably, but also estimate the amount of hidden messages exactly. Its advantages also include simplicity, computational efficiency and easy implementation of real-time detection. Experiment results show the superiority of our approach over other steganalytic techniques.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
F. A. P. Petitcolas, R. J. Anderson, and M. G. Kuhn, Information Hiding -- A Survey. Proceeding of IEEE, Vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 1062--1078, June 1999.
 
2
 
3
Jiri Fridrich and M. Goljan. Practical Steganalysis: State of the Art. SPIE Vol. 4675, EI2002, January, 2002, pp. 1--13.
 
4
 
5
 
6
N. Provos and P. Honeyman. Detecting Steganographic Content on the Internet. ISOC NDSS'02, San Diego, CA, February 2002.
 
7
N. D. Memon, I. Avcibas, B. Sankur. Steganalysis Based on Image Quality Metrics. SPIE Vol. 4314, 2001, San Jose, California, USA.
 
8
 
9
E. Y. Lam, and J. W. Goodman. A Mathematical Analysis of the DCT Coefficient Distributions for Images. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, vol 9, No. 10, pp. 1661--1666, 2000.
 
10
R. L. Joshi and T. R. Fischer. Comparison of generalized Gaussian and Laplacian modeling in DCT image coding. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol.2, pp. 81--82, May 1995.
 
11
F. Müller. Distribution shape of two-dimensional DCT coefficients of natural images. Electronics Letters, 29(22):1935--1936, October 1993.
 
12
JPEG-JSteg-V4, http://www.funet.fi/pub/crypt/steganography/jpeg-jsteg-v4.diff.gz.
 
13
CBIR Image Database, University of Washington, http://ww.cs.washington.edu/research/magedatabase/roundtruth/.