Methodology first and language second: a way to teach object-oriented programming

ABSTRACT

C++ is a very successful object-oriented language. It is a required language for more and more students. It takes great effort and practice for these students to learn how to program in C++ and how to make object-oriented programs. One potential failure is that they have learned programming in C++ but do not know how to program in an object-oriented (OO) style. To avoid such failures, this paper proposes that first an object-oriented methodology is taught, and then the language itself. A six-step approach to teach the OO methodology is presented, followed by some innovative ways to teach different mechanisms in C++. In this way, students can master both object-oriented programming and C++ programming. The proposed teaching method is applicable to teaching other languages like Java and C#.

REFERENCES

• 1: Essam M. Arif, A methodology for teaching object-oriented programming concepts in an advanced programming course, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.32 n.2, p.30-34, June 2000 [doi>10.1145/355354.355367]
• 2: Bagert, D. J. and Calloni, B.A., Teaching programming concepts using an icon-based software design tool", IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol 42, No 4, Nov. 1999, 365--378.
• 3: Paolo Bresciani , Anna Perini , Paolo Giorgini , Fausto Giunchiglia , John Mylopoulos, A knowledge level software engineering methodology for agent oriented programming, Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents, p.648-655, May 2001, Montreal, Quebec, Canada [doi>10.1145/375735.376477]
• 4: Adele Goldberg , David Robson, Smalltalk-80: the language and its implementation, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1983
• 5: Cay S. Horstmann, Practical object-oriented development in C++ and Java, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1997
• 6: Amruth N. Kumar, Learning the interaction between pointers and scope in C++, Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, p.45-48, June 2001, Canterbury, United Kingdom
• 7: Yun-Tung Lau, The Art of Objects: Object-Oriented Design and Architecture, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2000
• 8: John Lewis, Myths about object-orientation and its pedagogy, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.32 n.1, p.245-249, Mar. 2000
• 9: Paul A. Luker, There's more to OOP than syntax!, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.26 n.1, p.56-60, March 1994
• 10: P. A. Luker, Never mind the language, what about the paradigm?, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.21 n.1, p.252-256, Feb. 1989
• 11: James C. McKim Jr, Using a Multi-Term Project to Teach Object Oriented Programming and Design, Proceedings of the Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems, p.468, August 03-07, 1998
• 12: Bertrand Meyer, Object-Oriented Software Construction, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1988
• 13: William Mitchell, A paradigm shift to OOP has occurred…implementation to follow, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, v.16 n.2, p.94-105, Jan. 2001
• 14: Pattis, R. E., Teaching OOP in C++ Using an Artificial Life Framework, SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol 32. No. 2, June 1997, 39--43.
• 15: J. Mark Pullen , Eugene Norris , Mark Fix, Teaching C++ in a multi-user virtual environment, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.32 n.2, p.60-64, June 2000 [doi>10.1145/355354.355376]
• 16: Derek Rayside , Gerard T. Campbell, Aristotle and object-oriented programming: why modern students need traditional logic, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.32 n.1, p.237-244, Mar. 2000
• 17: N. Clement Shammas, Moving from Turbo Pascal to Turbo C Plus, Sams, Indianapolis, IN, 1993
• 18: Valery Skylarov , Valery Sklyarov, The Revolutionary Guide to Turbo C++ with Disk, Wrox Press Ltd., Birmingham, UK, 1993
• 19: Bjarne Stroustrup, Why C++ is not just an object-oriented programming language, Addendum to the proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications (Addendum), p.1-13, October 15-19, 1995, Austin, Texas, United States
• 20: Antero Taivalsaari, On the notion of inheritance, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.28 n.3, p.438-479, Sept. 1996 [doi>10.1145/243439.243441]
• 21: Venkatesh , K. and Zhou, M. C. Object-oriented design of FMS Control Software based on Object Modeling Technique Diagrams and Petri nets, J. of Manufacturing Systems, Vol 17, No 2,1998, 118--136.
• 22: Zhu, H. and Hu, S., The Chicken-and-Egg Problem in the Object-Oriented Technology, Proceedings of 1994 Kunming International CASE Symposium(KICS'94), Kunming, China, Dec., 1994, 122--127.
• 23: Zhu, H., Yang, G., and Liu, Z., Object Oriented Principle and its Applications, Publishing House of Changsha Institute of Technology, Sept. 1998.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.1 PROGRAMMING TECHNIQUES
      D.1.5 Object-oriented Programming

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
  D.3 PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES
      D.3.2 Language Classifications
      D.3.3 Language Constructs and Features

General Terms:
Design, Languages, Theory

Keywords:
C++, object-oriented programming, teaching methodology