ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Incentive-based modeling and inference of attacker intent, objectives, and strategies
Full text PdfPdf (332 KB)
Source Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Computer and communications security table of contents
Washington D.C., USA
SESSION: Information warfare table of contents
Pages: 179 - 189  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-738-9
Authors
Peng Liu  Penn State University, University Park, PA
Wanyu Zang  Penn State University, University Park, PA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 72,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/948109.948135
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Although the ability to model and infer Attacker Intent, Objectives and Strategies (AIOS) may dramatically advance the literature of risk assessment, harm prediction, and predictive or proactive cyber defense, existing AIOS inference techniques are ad hoc and system or application specific. In this paper, we present a general incentive-based method to model AIOS and a game theoretic approach to infer AIOS. On one hand, we found that the concept of incentives can unify a large variety of attacker intents; the concept of utilities can integrate incentives and costs in such a way that attacker objectives can be practically modeled. On the other hand, we developed a game theoretic AIOS formalization which can capture the inherent inter-dependency between AIOS and defender objectives and strategies in such a way that AIOS can be automatically inferred. Finally, we use a specific case study to show how AIOS can be inferred in real world attack-defense scenarios.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
The network simulator ns-2. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.
 
2
 
3
R. Browne. C4i defensive infrastructure for survivability against multi-mode attacks. In Proc. 21st Century Military Communications - Architectures and Technologies for Information Superiority, 2000.
 
4
D. Buike. Towards a game theory model of information warfare. Technical report, Airforce Institute of Technology, 1999. Master's Thesis.
 
5
E. H. Clarke. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice, 11:17--33, 1971.
 
6
V. Conitzer and T. Sandholm. Complexity results about nash equilibria. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002. CMU-CS-02-135.
 
7
 
8
9
 
10
A. M. Fink. Equilibrium in a stochastic n-person game. Journal of Science in Hiroshima University, Series A-I, (28):89--93, 1964.
11
 
12
T. Groves. Incentives in teams. Econometrica, 41:617--663, 1973.
 
13
J. P. Hespanha and S. Bohacek. Preliminary results in routing games. In Proc. 2001 American Control Conference, 2001.
 
14
J. Nash. Equilibrium Points in n-Person Games Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36, 1950.
 
15
J. Ioannidis and S. M. Bellovin. Implementing pushback: Router-based defense against ddos attacks. In Proc. 2002 Network and Distributed Systems Security, 2002.
 
16
D. Koller and B. Milch. Multi-agent influence diagrams for representing and solving games. In Proc. 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2001.
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
K. Lye and J. M. Wing. Game strategies in network security. In Proc. 15th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, 2002.
 
21
 
22
A. Mas-Colell, M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, 1 edition, 1995.
 
23
J. McHugh. Intrusion and intrusion detection. International Journal of Information Security, (1):14--35, 2001.
 
24
M. Mesterton-Gibbons. An Introduction to Game-Theoretic Modeling. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1992.
 
25
B. Mukherjee, L. T. Heberlein, and K.N. Levitt. Network intrusion detection. IEEE Network, pages 26--41, June 1994.
26
 
27
N. Nisan and A. Ronen. Algorithmic mechanism design. Games and Economic Behavior, 35, 2001.
 
28
 
29
F. Thusijsman. Optimality and Equilibria in Stochastic Games. Gentrum voor Wiskunde en Information, Amsterdam, 1992.
 
30
W. Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16:8--37, 1961.
 
31
 
32
M. P. Wellman and W. E. Walsh. Auction protocols for decentralized scheduling. Games and Economic Behavior, 35, 2001.
33
 
34