ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Comparing the usage of digital rights management systems in the music, film, and print industry
Full text PdfPdf (213 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 50 archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Pages: 316 - 325  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-788-5
Authors
Marc Fetscherin  University Bern, Bern/Switzerland
Matthias Schmid  University Bern, Bern/Switzerland
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 63,   Downloads (12 Months): 367,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/948005.948047
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The business of content providers is being threatened by technology advances in hardware, software and IP-networks such as the Internet or peer-to-peer file sharing systems. The result is an increasing amount of illegal copies available on-line as well as off-line.With the emergence of Digital Rights Management Systems (DRMS), the media and entertainment industry seems to have found the appropriate tool to simultaneously fight piracy and to monetize their assets. Although these systems are very powerful and include multiple protection technologies, it is currently unknown to what extent such systems are used by content providers.This paper provides empirical results, analyses and conclusions related to Digital Rights Management Systems and the protection of digital content in the music, film, and print industries. It outlines the similarities and the differences of usages among the above mentioned industries. The paper concludes that each industry uses different protection technologies and that password and encryption are the most frequently used. The majority of the respondents are satisfied with their current protection but want to enforce it in the future due to fear of increasing piracy. The requirements for DRMS are perceived differently from industry to industry as is the average amount of investment. Furthermore, approximately half of the respondents from the music industry do not believe in the ability of DRMS to reduce piracy, whereas respondents from the film and print industry believe that DRMS will be able to do so.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
URL: http://www.adobe.co.uk/epaper/features/drm/drmtools.html.
 
2
Association of American Publishers, A. Digital Rights Management for Ebooks: Publisher Requirements, 2000.
 
3
Bechtold, S. Vom Urheberzum Informationsrecht, Implikationen des Digital Rights Management. Verlag C. H. Beck oHG, München, 2002.
 
4
Buhse, W., Digital Rights Management for Music Filesharing Communities. in Proceedings of the Seventh Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2001), (Boston, MA, 2002).
 
5
Cope, B. and Freeman, R. Digital Rights Management & Content Development Technology Drivers across the Book Production Supply Chain, from Creator to Consumer. Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd, Australia, 2001.
 
6
Felten, E., Craver, S., Wu, M., Liu, B., Stubblefield, A., Swartzlander, B. and Wallach, D., Reading Between the Lines: Lessons from the SDMI Challenge. in Proceedings of the 10th USENIX Security Symposium, (Washington, DC, 2001).
 
7
Fetscherin, M. Present State and Emerging Scenarios of Digital Rights Management Systems. The International Journal on Media Management, 4 (3). 164--171.
 
8
Gordon, L. The Internet Marketplace and Digital Rights Management, Gaithersburg, 2001.
 
9
Halderman, J. A. Evaluating New Copy-Prevention Techniques for Audio CD, 2002.
 
10
Heil, T. Digital Rights Management - Konzepte und deren Eignung zum Interessenausgliech im Business-to-Consumer Bereich Fachhochschule Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, 2002, 85.
 
11
URL: http://www-3.ibm.com/software/data/emms/.
 
12
McGarvey, R. Pay-Per-View's Payback: Cashing in with Content., August 2001. 31--37.
 
13
URL: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/drm.aspx.
 
14
Mulholland, J. Digital Rights (mis)Management, W3C DRM Workshop, 2001.
 
15
Pack, T. Digital Rights Management: Can Technology Provide Long-Term Solutions? E-Content, 5 (6). 22--27.
 
16
Pfeiffer, A. The Hidden Dangers of Digital Rights Management, 2001.
 
17
Pitkänen, O. and Välimäki, M. Towards A Digital Rights Management Framework, Finland, 2001, 12.
 
18
 
19
Samuelson, P., DRM {and, or, vs.} THE LAW. in Workshop on Proactive DRM, (Berkley, California, 2003).
 
20
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. Research Methods for Business Students - Second Edition. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, 2000.
 
21
Seybold Research. Digital Rights Management: Usage, Attitudes and Profile of Users, Seybold Seminar & Publications, Foster City, 2001.
 
22
Weintraub, A. Management Update: Content Management - Timetable for Digital Rights Management, Gartner Group, 2001, 4.
 
23
Wessels, J. The future of digital content - Free or paid ?, 2000.
 
24
Yin, R. Case Study Research - Design and Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc., London, 1994.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Marc Fetscherin: colleagues
Matthias Schmid: colleagues