How DRM-based content delivery systems disrupt expectations of "personal use"

ABSTRACT

We set out to examine whether current, DRM-based online offerings of music and movies accord with consumers' current expectations regarding the personal use of copyrighted works by studying the behavior of six music, and two film online distribution services. We find that, for the most part, the services examined do not accord with expectations of personal use. The DRM-based services studied restrict personal use in a manner inconsistent with the norms and expectations governing the purchase and rental of traditional physical CDs, DVDs, and videocassettes. If adopted by consumers the DRM systems stand to alter the norms governing personal use of copyrighted content and create pitfalls of legal liability for unsuspecting consumers. In conclusion, we present technological and legal considerations which may help current and future DRM system designers better accommodate consumers' expectations of personal use.

REFERENCES

• 1: 17 U.S.C. § 109(b)(1)(A).
• 2: 17 U.S.C.§ 1201(a)(1)(A) (2003).
• 3: 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(3)(B) (2003) (defining a "technological measure" that "effectively controls access to a work").
• 4: 18 U.S.C.§ 1030(a)(5)(B)(i) (2003).
• 5: 18 U.S.C. § 1030(g) (2003).
• 6: 18 U.S.C. § 2710.
• 7: 18 U.S.C. § 2710(a)(4).
• 8: 18 U.S.C .§ 2710(b)(2).
• 9: 18 U.S.C. § 2710(e).
• 10: Peter Biddle, Paul England, Marcus Peinado, Bryan Willman, The Darknet and the Future of Content Distribution, in PROCEEDINGS OF 2002 ACM DRM WORKSHOP. Available at <http://crypto.stanford.edu/DRM2002/darknet5.doc.
• 11: Dan L. Burk & Julie E. Cohen, Fair Use Infrastructure for Rights Management Systems, 15 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 41 (2001).
• 12: CinemaNow Privacy Statement. See http://www.cinemanow.com/about/privacy.asp.
• 13: CinemaNow Terms of Use. See http://www.cinemanow.com/about/terms_of_use.asp.
• 14: Julie E. Cohen, DRM and privacy, Communications of the ACM, v.46 n.4, April 2003 [doi>10.1145/641205.641230]
• 15: Julie E. Cohen, Lochner in Cyberspace: The New Economic Orthodoxy of "Rights Management", 97 MICH. L. REV. 462 (1998) (criticizing assertions of the fairness and efficiency in DRM systems).
• 16: Committee on Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure, The Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information Age, National Academy of Science (2000), 133--135.
• 17: Digital Consumer List of Users' Rights. See http://www.digitalconsumer.org/bill.html.
• 18: EF Cultural Travel BV v. Zefer Corp., 318 F.3d 58, 63 (1st Cir. 2003) (suggesting that passwords implicitly limit "authorized access" to the holder of the account to which the password is assigned).
• 19: EF Travel v. Explorica, 274 F.3d 577 (1st Cir. 2001).
• 20: Electronic Privacy Information Center, Digital Rights Management and Privacy. See http://www.epic.org/privacy/drm/.
• 21: John S. Erickson, Fair use, DRM, and trusted computing, Communications of the ACM, v.46 n.4, April 2003 [doi>10.1145/641205.641228]
• 22: The Ethereal Network Analyzer. See http://www.ethereal.com/.
• 23: Edward W. Felten, A skeptical view of DRM and fair use, Communications of the ACM, v.46 n.4, April 2003 [doi>10.1145/641205.641232]
• 24: Barbara L. Fox , Brian A. LaMacchia, Encouraging recognition of fair uses in DRM systems, Communications of the ACM, v.46 n.4, April 2003 [doi>10.1145/641205.641233]
• 25: I. Trotter Hardy, Property (and Copyright) in Cyberspace, 1996 U. CHI. LEGAL F. 217.
• 26: Jon Healy, Faster Than the Speed of Software; The record labels have a new idea for selling music online. The only catch: This time, they are ahead of the technology needed for it to happen, L.A. Times, Part 3; Page 1 (Apr. 27, 2003).
• 27: Mark A. Lemley, "Beyond Preemption: The Law and Policy of Intellectual Property Licensing," 87 Cal. L. Rev. 111 (1999).
• 28: Lawrence Lessig , Lawrence Lessing, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Basic Books, Inc., New York, NY, 2000
• 29: Jessica Litman, Symposium: Copyright Law as Communications Policy: Convergence of Paradigms and Cultures: War Stories, 20 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment L.J. 337, 338-339 (2002) (discussing Congress' unwillingness to define personal use but willingness to protect consumers from liability for specific non-commercial uses).
• 30: Michael J. Meurer, Focus on Cyberlaw: Price Discrimination, Personal Use and Piracy: Copyright Protection of Digital Works, 45 Buffalo L. Rev. 845, 859 (1997) (noting that personal use rights are not precisely defined and that none result in competition with the copyright holder).
• 31: MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 259 F. Supp. 2d 1029, 1038 (C.D. Cal. 2003) ("Grokster is of course aware as a general matter that some of its users are infringing copyrights.") (internal quotation and citation omitted).
• 32: Movielink Privacy Policy. See http://www.movielink.com/commerce/help/privacy.jhtml.
• 33: Deirdre K. Mulligan & Aaron J. Burstein, Implementing Copyright Limitations in Rights Expression Languages, in PROCEEDINGS OF 2002 ACM DRM WORKSHOP. Available at http://crypto.stanford.edu/DRM2002/mulligan_burstein_acm_drm_2002.doc.
• 34: Ryan Naraine, Pressplay Goes Unlimited, Rhapsody Does DirectTV, InternetNews.com, (August 1, 2002). See http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/1437451.
• 35: Patrick Norton, Convert Windows Media to WAV, TechTV (November 14, 2001). See http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/answerstips/story/0,24330,3337090,00.html.
• 36: Pressplay Terms of Service. See http://www.pressplay.com/terms.html.
• 37: Real Networks, Realnetworks Launches Realone Rhapsody Music Subscription Service, 2003 Press Releases. See http://www.realnetworks.com/company/press/releases/2003/rhapsody.html.
• 38: Recording Indus. Ass'n of Am. v. Diamond Multimedia Sys., 180 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 1999) (holding that Rio, a portable digital device for playing MP3 files, makes copies to enable portability, or "space-shift{ing} which is a paradigmatic fair use").
• 39: Reuters, New Deals from MusicNet Quintet, November 14, 2002. See http://news.com.com/2102-1023-965928.html.
• 40: Pamela Samuelson, DRM {and, or, vs.} the law, Communications of the ACM, v.46 n.4, April 2003 [doi>10.1145/641205.641229]
• 41: Michael Singer, Apple's Making Serious Music, InternetNews.com (April 28, 2003). See http://siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/2197271.
• 42: Snort: The Open Source Network Intrusion Detection System. See http://www.snort.org/.
• 43: Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studio, 464 U.S. 417, 455, 78 L. Ed. 2d 574, 104 S. Ct. 774 (1984) (holding that "time-shifting" of copyrighted television shows with VCR's is fair use).
• 44: System Internals Freeware, Filemon for Windows. See http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/filemon.shtml.
• 45: Texas Penal Code § 31.04(a)(1) (providing that a "person commits theft of service if, with intent to avoid payment for service that he knows is provided only for compensation . . . he intentionally or knowingly secures performance of the service by deception, threat, or false token.").
• 46: Deborah Tussey, From Fan Site to Filesharing: Personal Use in Cyberspace, 35 Ga. L. Rev. 1129, 1143--44 (2001) (discussing the overlap between fair use and personal use but noting that many commonly engaged in personal uses have never been labeled "fair" by the courts and may well not be if presented).
• 47: Universal City Studios v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001). (This interpretation may clash with the intent of Congress to make "circumvention of copy- and use-controls . . . lawful when performed for noninfringing purposes, such as to enable fair uses.").
• 48: Universal City Studios v. Reimerdes, 111 F. Supp. 2d 294 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (affirmed on appeal under the name Universal City Studios v. Corley).
• 49: United States v. Morris, 928 F.2d 504 (2nd Cir. 1991).
• 50: Hal Varian, Carl Shapiro, Information Rules, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 97--98.
• 51: Windows Media Player for Windows XP Privacy Statement. See http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/software/v8/privacy.aspx.
• 52: Todd Woody, The Race to Kill Kazaa, Wired Magazine Issue 11.02 (February 2003). Available at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.02/kazaa_pr.html.
• 53: Pressplay Privacy Policy. See http://www.pressplay.com/privacypolicy.html.
• 54: Joan Feigenbaum , Michael J. Freedman , Tomas Sander , Adam Shostack, Privacy Engineering for Digital Rights Management Systems, Revised Papers from the ACM CCS-8 Workshop on Security and Privacy in Digital Rights Management, p.76-105, November 05, 2001

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.5 LEGAL ASPECTS OF COMPUTING
      K.5.0 General

General Terms:
Legal Aspects

Keywords:
access control, content distribution, copyright, digital rights management, fair use, personal use, privacy