ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Strategic decisions on technology selections for facilitating a network/systems laboratory using real options & total cost of ownership theories
Full text PdfPdf (407 KB)
Source Conference On Information Technology Education (formerly CITC) archive
Proceedings of the 4th conference on Information technology curriculum table of contents
Lafayette, Indiana, USA
SESSION: Technology to enable learning table of contents
Pages: 76 - 92  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-770-2
Authors
Kimfong Lei  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Phillip T. Rawles  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Sponsors
SIGITE: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Technology Education
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 119,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/947121.947139
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the selection of technologies that provide each student group a dedicated environment on a non-dedicated host machine. The authors investigated different combinations of enabling technologies and approaches, such as virtual machine technology, storage technology, and host operating system. Performance tests were developed and executed to profile the performance of the technologies. The results of this work provide an evaluation of the studied technologies and a selection guide for institutions to assist in technology selection to facilitate a system and networking laboratory.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Babcock, C. (2000, May 1) VMware welcomes guest OSes. Interactive Week, 7(17), 86.
 
2
Babcock, C. (2000, September 18). Storage: A line in the SAN. Interactive Week, 7(37).
 
3
Borck, J. R. (2002, February 11). Virtual virtuosity. InfoWorld, 24(6).
 
4
 
5
Cappucio, D., Keyworth, B. & Kirwin W. (1996, Sept 17). Total cost of ownership: The impact of system management tools. Gartner Group, Stamford, CT.
 
6
Choi, H. (2002, August 14). Review: Connectix Virtual PC 5.0. TechTV. http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/print/0,23102,3395948,00.html.
 
7
Cox, J. C., Ross, J. E. & Rubinstein, M. (1979). Option pricing: A simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 145--166.
8
 
9
Doherty, W. J., & Thadani, A. J. (1982). The economic value of rapid response time. http://www.vm.ibm.com/devpages/jelliott/evrrt.html.
 
10
Dryden, P. (1998, April 13). "Futz factor' measurement tough to pin down in TCO. Computerworld. http://www.computerworld.com/news/1998/story/0,11280,30535,00.html.
 
11
Farbey, B., Land, F. & Targett, D. (1999). Evaluating investments in IT: Findings and a framework. In L. P. Willcocks & S. Lester, Beyond the IT productivity paradox (185-192). Chichester, UK: Johns Wiley & Sons Ltd.
 
12
Gartenberg, M. (2000, October, 30). Myths beyond TCO. Computerworld, 34(44), 52--54.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kimfong Lei: colleagues
Phillip T. Rawles: colleagues