ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, the FTC, and Spam
Full text HtmlHtml (30 KB),  PdfPdf (1.28 MB)
Source
Queue archive
Volume 1 ,  Issue 6  (September 2003) table of contents
Developer Tools
FEATURE: Features table of contents
Pages: 62 - 69  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:1542-7730
Author
Eric Allman  Sendmail
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 179,   Downloads (12 Months): 514,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/945131.945157
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) held a forum on spam in Washington, D.C., April 30 to May 2. Rather to my surprise, it was a really good, content-full event. The FTC folks had done their homework and had assembled panelists that ran the gamut from ardent anti-spammers all the way to hard-core spammers and everyone in between: lawyers, legitimate marketers, and representatives from vendor groups.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
1. Federal Trade Commission. False claims in spam: A report by the FTC's division of marketing practices (April 30, 2003); http://www.ftc.gov/reports/spam/ 030429spamreport.pdf.
 
2
2. Kane, Margaret. EarthLink wins $24 million from spammer (July 19, 2002); http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1106- 945169.html.
 
3
3. Text of Senate bill S.877 (CAN SPAM Act of 2003); http://thomas.loc.gov/.