ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Efficient sorting using registers and caches
Full text PdfPdf (265 KB),  PsPs (269 KB),  TarTar (307 KB)
Source Journal of Experimental Algorithmics (JEA) archive
Volume 7 ,  (2002) table of contents
Page: 9  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISSN:1084-6654
Authors
Rajiv Wickremesinghe  Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Box 90129, Durham, NC
Lars Arge  Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Box 90129, Durham, NC
Jeffrey S. Chase  Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Box 90129, Durham, NC
Jeffrey Scott Vitter  Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Box 90129, Durham, NC
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 61,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/944618.944627
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Modern computer systems have increasingly complex memory systems. Common machine models for algorithm analysis do not reflect many of the features of these systems, e.g., large register sets, lockup-free caches, cache hierarchies, associativity, cache line fetching, and streaming behavior. Inadequate models lead to poor algorithmic choices and an incomplete understanding of algorithm behavior on real machines.A key step toward developing better models is to quantify the performance effects of features not reflected in the models. This paper explores the effect of memory system features on sorting performance. We introduce a new cache-conscious sorting algorithm, R-MERGE, which achieves better performance in practice over algorithms that are superior in the theoretical models. R-MERGE is designed to minimize memory stall cycles rather than cache misses by considering features common to many system designs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AGGARWAL, A., ALPERN, B., CHANDRA, A. K., AND SNIR, M. 1987. A model for hierarchical memory. Volume 19 (New York, 1987), pp. 305-314.
 
2
AGGARWAL, A., CHANDRA, A., AND SNIR, M. 1987. Hierarchical memory with block transfer. Volume 28 (Los Angeles, 1987), pp. 204-216.
3
 
4
ALPERN, B., CARTER, L., FEIG, E., AND SELKER, T. 1994. The uniform memory hierarchy model of computation. 12, 2-3, 72-109.
5
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
LAMARCA, A. AND LADNER, R. E. 1997. The influence of caches on the performance of sorting. Volume 7 (January 1997), pp. 370-379.
 
15
 
16
RAHMAN, N. AND RAMAN, R. 2000. Adapting radix sort to the memory hierarchy. In ALENEX, Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experimentation (2000).
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
21
 
22
VITTER, J. S. AND SHRIVER, E.A.M. 1994. Algorithms for parallel memory I: Two-level memories. 12, 2-3, 110-147.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Rajiv Wickremesinghe: colleagues
Lars Arge: colleagues
Jeffrey S. Chase: colleagues
Jeffrey Scott Vitter: colleagues