|
ABSTRACT
Research into providing different levels of network Quality of Service (QoS) often assumes that there is a large market for QoS-sensitive applications that will be fulfilled once QoS-enabled networks have been deployed. Multiplayer networked games are an example of such an application that requires QoS, and hence will only become popular if QoS is made widely available. The prima facie evidence, however, is that games are already popular, in spite of the existing QoS-free best-effort Internet.Networked games may have become popular despite the lack of QoS because players "make do" with what is available to them. Such popularity is a double-edged sword. It may mean that there is a demand, as yet unfulfilled, from game players for QoS-enabled networks. On the other hand, it may mean that players have become accustomed to playing games without QoS, and therefore might be less willing to pay for higher QoS when it does eventually become available.In this paper we present the results of a short experiment to examine the QoS tolerances of game players. We use a set of popular First Person Shooter (FPS) game servers that are publicly available to Internet users at large. By systematically altering the network latency to the servers, we attempt to study whether degraded QoS (in the form of higher network delay) affects a user's decision to participate in the game.We find that increased network delay has an effect on a user's decision to join a game server. It appears, however, that there is no significant difference in the number of players who leave the game as a result of increased delay. We speculate that this may be due to a user's enjoyment exceeding their QoS-sensitivity, and discuss the implications of our findings with respect to providing and charging for QoS.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
G. Armitage. Sensitivity of Quake3 players to network latency. Poster, ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop 2001, Berkeley, CA, USA, Nov. 2001.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Y. W. Bernier. Latency compensating methods in client/server in-game protocol design and optimization. In Proceedings of the 15th Games Developers Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, Mar. 2001.
|
| |
4
|
S. Blake, D. L. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss. An architecture for differentiated services, Dec. 1998. RFC 2475.
|
| |
5
|
R. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker. Integrated Services in the Internet architecture: an overview, June 1994. RFC 1633.
|
| |
6
|
S. Cheshire. Latency and the quest for interactivity, Nov. 1996. White paper commissioned by Volpe Welty Asset Management, L.L.C., for the Synchronous Person-to-Person Interactive Computing Environments Meeting.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Inside Sony Online Entertainment. Edge, 102:56--61, Oct. 2001.
|
| |
9
|
P. C. Fishburn and A. M. Odlyzko. Competitive pricing of information goods: Subscription pricing versus pay-per-use. Economic Theory, 13(2):447--470, Mar. 1999.
|
| |
10
|
J. Heinanen, F. Baker, W. Weiss, and J. Wroclawski. Assured forwarding PHB group, June 1999. RFC 2597.
|
| |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. 1278.2-1995, IEEE Standard for Distributed Interactive Simulation --- Communication Services and Profiles. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, Apr. 1996.
|
| |
14
|
International Telecommunication Union. ITU-T Recommendation G.114: International telephone connections and circuits --- General Recommendations on the transmission quality for an entire international telephone connection --- One-way transmission time. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland, May 2000.
|
| |
15
|
V. Jacobson, K. Nichols, and K. Poduri. An expedited forwarding PHB, June 1999. RFC 2598.
|
| |
16
|
Y. A. Korilis, A. A. Lazar, and A. Orda. Architecting noncooperative networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas In Communications, 13(7):1241--1251, Sept. 1995.
|
| |
17
|
J. Larkin. Winning the monster game. Far Eastern Economic Review, page 32, Sept. 05, 2002.
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
L. Mathy, C. Edwards, and D. Hutchison. Principles of QoS in group communications. Telecommunication Systems, 11(1--2):59--84, 1999.
|
| |
20
|
S. McCreary and K. Claffy. Trends in wide area IP traffic patterns: A view from Ames Internet Exchange. In Proceedings of the ITC Specialist Seminar on IP Traffic Modeling, Measurement and Management, Monterey, CA, USA, Sept. 2000.
|
| |
21
|
E. Medina. Yahoo enters game rental arena. Boston Globe, page C3, Sept. 23, 2002.
|
| |
22
|
netfilter/iptables project. http://netfilter.samba.org.
|
| |
23
|
A. M. Odlyzko. Internet pricing and the history of communications. Computer Networks, 36(5--6):493--517, Aug. 2001.
|
 |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
 |
26
|
Kihong Park , Meera Sitharam , Shaogang Chen, Quality of service provision in noncooperative networks: heterogenous preferences, multi-dimensional QoS vectors, and burstiness, Proceedings of the first international conference on Information and computation economies, p.111-127, October 25-28, 1998, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
[doi> 10.1145/288994.289022]
|
| |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
A. Patrizio. Coming soon: Pay-per-game. Wired News, Oct. 20, 2000. http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,39505,00.html.
|
| |
29
|
M. Ranta-aho, A. Leppinen, G. Poulain, A. Roella, M. Mirabelli, A. Ousland, and J. Norgaard. Task-dependent user requirements for Quality of service of Videoconferencing-CSCW services. In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications, pages 251--254, Oslo, Norway, May 1997.
|
| |
30
|
D. P. Reed. Going nowhere fast. Context Magazine, July/Aug. 1999.
|
 |
31
|
Christian Schaefer , Thomas Enderes , Hartmut Ritter , Marina Zitterbart, Subjective quality assessment for multiplayer real-time games, Proceedings of the 1st workshop on Network and system support for games, p.74-78, April 16-17, 2002, Bruanschweig, Germany
[doi> 10.1145/566500.566511]
|
 |
32
|
Nathan Sheldon , Eric Girard , Seth Borg , Mark Claypool , Emmanuel Agu, The effect of latency on user performance in Warcraft III, Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Network and system support for games, p.3-14, May 22-23, 2003, Redwood City, California
[doi> 10.1145/963900.963901]
|
| |
33
|
Slashdot.org. How fast too slow? A study of Quake pings, May 24, 2001. http://slashdot.org/articles/01/05/24/2044233.shtml.
|
| |
34
|
M. Terrano and P. Bettner. 1500 archers on a 28.8: Network programming in Age of Empires and beyond. In Proceedings of the 15th Games Developers Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, Mar. 2001.
|
 |
35
|
|
CITED BY 20
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Quax , Patrick Monsieurs , Wim Lamotte , Danny De Vleeschauwer , Natalie Degrande, Objective and subjective evaluation of the influence of small amounts of delay and jitter on a recent first person shooter game, Proceedings of 3rd ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Network and system support for games, August 30-30, 2004, Portland, Oregon, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jason But , Thuy Nguyen , Lawrence Stewart , Nigel Williams , Grenville Armitage, Performance analysis of the ANGEL system for automated control of game traffic prioritisation, Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Network and system support for games, p.123-128, September 19-20, 2007, Melbourne, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lozano , P. Morillo , J. M. Orduña , V. Cavero , G. Vigueras, A new system architecture for crowd simulation, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, v.32 n.2, p.474-482, March, 2009
|
|
|
Brian Carrig , David Denieffe , John Murphy, Congestion-only charging: a novel pricing mechanism for use in differentiated services networks, The Fourth International Conference on Heterogeneous Networking for Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness & Workshops, August 14-17, 2007, Vancouver, Canada
|
|