ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
QoS's downfall: at the bottom, or not at all!
Full text PdfPdf (161 KB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Revisiting IP QoS: What have we learned, why do we care? table of contents
Karlsruhe, Germany
SESSION: Session 1 table of contents
Pages: 109 - 114  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-748-6
Authors
Jon Crowcroft  University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Steven Hand  University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Richard Mortier  Microsoft Research, Cambridge, UK
Timothy Roscoe  Intel Research, Berkeley, CA
Andrew Warfield  University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 62,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/944592.944594
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Quality of Service (QoS) has been touted as a technological requirement for many different networks at many different times. However, very few (if any) schemes for providing it have ever been successful, despite a huge amount of research in the area of QoS provision. In this position paper we analyze some of the reasons why so many QoS mechanisms have failed to be widely deployed. We suggest two factors in this failure: the timeliness of QoS mechanisms (they rarely arrive when they are needed), and the inherent contradiction of layering QoS mechanisms over a best-effort network. We also give some thoughts on how future QoS research might increase its chances of successful deployment by better positioning itself relative to other developments in networking.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
CROWCROFT, J., GIBBENS, R., KELLY, F., AND OSTRING, S. Modelling incentives for collaboration in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of WiOpt'03: Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (Mar. 2003).
 
3
GIBBENS, R., AND KELLY, F. Resource pricing and the evolution of congestion control. Automatica 35 (1999), 1969--1985.
 
4
JANNOTTI, J., GIFFORD, D., JOHNSON, K., KAASHOEK, M., AND JR, J. O. Overcast: Reliable multicasting with an overlay network. In Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation (OSDI'00) (Oct. 2000).
 
5
KELLY, F. Charging and rate control for elastic traffic. European Transactions on Telecommunications 8 (1997), 33---37.
 
6
KELLY, F. Models for a self-managed Internet. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (2000), 2335--2348.
 
7
KELLY, F., KEY, P., AND ZACHARY, S. Distributed admission control. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas In Communications 18, 12 (2000), 2617--2628.
 
8
KELLY, F., MAULLOO, A., AND TAN, D. Rate control in communication networks: Shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49 (1998), 237--252.
 
9
KEY, P., MCAULEY, D., BARHAM, P., AND LAEVENS, K. Congestion pricing for congestion avoidance. Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-99-15, Microsoft Research, Feb. 1999. http://www.research.microsoft.com/research/network/disgame.htm.
 
10
KIM, P. Resource reservation in shared and switched demand priority LANs. Available from ftp://cs.ucl.ac.uk/darpa/pk_phd_thesis.ps.Z, Sept. 1998.
 
11
MORTIER, R. Internet traffic engineering. Tech. Rep. UCAM-CL-TR-532, University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, Apr. 2002.
12
13
 
14
SHENKER, S., CLARK, D., ESTRIN, D., AND HERZOG, S. Pricing in Computer Networks: Reshaping the Research Agenda. In The Internet and Telecommunications Policy, G. Brock and G. Rosston, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.
 
15
SUBRAMANIAN, L., STOICA, I., BALAKRISHNAN, H., AND KATZ, R. OverQoS: Offering QoS using Overlays. In First Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-I) (Oct. 2002).
 
16
TENNENHOUSE, D. L. Layered Multiplexing Considered Harmful. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on High-Speed Networks (May 1989).

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jon Crowcroft: colleagues
Steven Hand: colleagues
Richard Mortier: colleagues
Timothy Roscoe: colleagues
Andrew Warfield: colleagues