ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Improving protocol capacity with model-based frame scheduling in IEEE 802.11-operated WLANs
Full text PdfPdf (481 KB)
Source International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking archive
Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Wireless LAN optimizations table of contents
Pages: 190 - 204  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-753-2
Authors
Hwangnam Kim
Jennifer C. Hou  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 92,   Citation Count: 13
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/938985.939005
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we develop a model-based frame scheduling scheme, called MFS, to enhance the capacity of IEEE 802.11-operated wireless LANs (WLANs). In MFS each node estimates the current network status by keeping track of the number of collisions it encounters between its two consecutive successful frame transmissions, and, based on the the estimated information, computes the current network utilization. The result is then used to determine a scheduling delay that is introduced (with the objective of avoiding collision) before a node attempts for transmission of its pending frame. In order to accurately calculate the current utilization in WLANs, we develop an analytical model that characterizes data transmission activities in IEEE 802.11-operated WLANs with/without the RTS/CTS mechanism, and validate the model with ns-2 simulation. All the control overhead incurred in the physical and MAC layers, as well as system parameters specified in IEEE 802.11 are figured in.We have conducted a comprehensive simulation study to evaluate MFS in perspective of number of collisions, achievable throughput, and inter-transmission delay. The simulation results indicate that the performance improvement with respect to protocol capacity can be as high as 20% with RTS/CTS and 150% without RTS/CTS, in a WLAN of up to 300 nodes. In addition, the inter-transmission delay in MFS is smaller and exhibits less variation than that in IEEE 802.11.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
I. Ada and C. Castelluccia. Differentiation Mechanisms for IEEE 802.11. In Proceedings of INFOCOM 2001, (Anchorage, Alaska, April 2000), March 2001.
 
2
U. Berkeley, LBL, USC/ISI, and X. PARC. The ns manual. http://www-mash.cs.berkeley.edu/ns/, April 2002.
 
3
V. Bharghavan. Performance Evaluation of Algorithms for Wireless Medium Access. In Proceedings of IEEE International Computer Performance and Dependability Symposium, 1998.
 
4
G. Bianchi. Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(3), March 2000.
 
5
G. Bianchi, L. Fratta, and M. Oliveri. Performance Evaluation and Enhancement of the CSMA/CA MAC Protocol for 802.11 Wireless LANs. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Communication (PIMC), 1996.
 
6
F. Cali, M. Conti, and E. Gregori. IEEE 802.11: Design and Performance Evaluation of an Adaptive Backoff Mechanism. IEEE Journal On Selected Areas in Communications, 18(9), September 2000.
 
7
 
8
C. H. Foh and M. Zukerman. Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.11 MAC Protocol. In Proceedings of he EW 2002 Conference, (Italy, 2002), February 2002.
9
 
10
T. S. Ho and K. C. Chen. Performance Evaluation and Enhancement of CSMA/CA MAC Protocol for 802.11 Wireless LANs. In Proceedings of IEEE PIMRC 1996, (Taipei, Taiwan, October 1996), October 1996.
 
11
IEEE. IEEE Standard for Wireless LAN-Medium Access Control and Physical Layer Specification. IEEE, 1990.
 
12
A. Veres, A. T. Campbell, and M. Barry. Service Differentiation in Wireless Packet Networks Using Distributed Control. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 19(10), October 2001.
 
13
 
14
J. Weinmiller, H. Woesner, J. P. Evert, and A. Wolisz. Analyzing and Tunning the Distributed Coordination Function in the IEEE 802.11 DFWMAC draft standard. In Proceedings of Intl. Workshop on Modelling MASCOT '96, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, (San Jose, California, 1996), February 1996.
 
15
H. Wu, Y. Peng, K. Long, S. Cheng, and J. Ma. Performance of Reliable Transport Protocol over IEEE 802.11 Wireless lan: Analysis and Enhancement. In http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/518320, 2002.

CITED BY  13

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hwangnam Kim: colleagues
Jennifer C. Hou: colleagues